Woods v. Swift et al
| Michael Woods |
| B. Swift and Hayes |
| 2:2014cv02665 |
| November 14, 2014 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| John A. Mendez |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
59
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/30/16 RECOMMENDING that Plaintiff's motion for an extension of time to conduct discovery (ECF No. 56 ) be denied; and Defendants' motion for summary judgment (ECF No. 47 ) be granted. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
53
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 06/3/16 granting 52 Motion to reinstate her motion for summary judgment. The parties shall both file the further briefing described above within 30 days of the date of this order. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
50
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 04/25/16 ordering plaintiff's motion to modify the scheduling order 31 is denied. Plaintiff's motion to compel 37 is denied. Plaintiff's motion for access to his legal propert y 44 , 45 are denied. Plaintiff's motion for leave to amend 35 is granted; this action now proceeds on the amended complaint attached to the motion to amend. Defendant's 2/11/16 summary judgment motion 47 is vacated. Defendant is granted 21 days to file a response to the amended complaint and inform the court whether she intends to conduct additional discovery; defendant shall also inform the court whether she seeks reinstatement of the vacated summary judgment motion filed 2/11/16. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
39
ORDER denying 36 Motion to Appoint Counsel signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 11/24/15. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
33
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/21/15 GRANTING 27 Motion to Dismiss defendant Hayes.(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/1/2015 ORDERING defendants to notify this court, within 7 days, whether they have any objection to the dismissal of defendant Hayes without prejudice.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
23
ORDER ADOPTING 21 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS, in full, signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 7/9/2015. Defendants' 17 Motion to Dismiss is DENIED and they are directed to file a response to Complaint within 20 days of service of this Order. (Marciel, M)
|
|
Filing
21
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 5/28/15 RECOMMENDING that re 17 MOTION to DISMISS filed by Hayes, B. Swift be denied; and defendants be ordered to file a response to the complaint within 20 days of the adoptiong of these findings and recommendations. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Meuleman, A)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Michael Woods signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 12/11/14. CDC is to collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial)(Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
