Fowler v. Foulk et al
| William L. Fowler |
| Fred Foulk, Suzanne M. Peery and Bland |
| 2:2015cv00919 |
| April 29, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Solano |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 7/2/15 ORDERING that this action is dismissed for failure to state a claim; and the Clerk of the Court is directed to enter judgment and close this file. CASE CLOSED. (Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 5/21/2015 ORDERING plaintiff to SHOW CAUSE in writing, within 30 days, why this action should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim.(Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of William L. Fowler signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 05/21/15 ordering plaintiff's motion to proceed in forma pauperis 2 is granted. Plaintiff is obligated to pay t he statutory filing fee of $350.00 for this action. CDC shall collect payments from plaintiff's account until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial)(Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
