Cases 1 - 10 of 1,727
Bland et al v. Prince George's County, Maryland et al
as 8:2024cv01199
Plaintiff:
Paula Bland and Jasmine Weaver
Defendant:
PRINCE GEORGE'S COUNTY,MD, Shantel Blanton, Tariq Hall and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question: Other Civil Rights
BLAND v. LLT MANAGEMENT LLC et al
as 3:2024cv05522
Defendant:
LLT MANAGEMENT LLC, LTL MANAGEMENT LLC, JANSSEN PHARMACEUTICALS, INC and others
Plaintiff:
CRYSTAL BLAND
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Product Liability
Patten v. Thompson et al
as 0:2024cv60676
Plaintiff:
Barrington Roderick Patten
Defendant:
Stevie Tyrone Thompson, Harry James Robinson, II, Lamont James Mitchell and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 0241 Conspiracy Against Citizen Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-11239
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Not Yet Classified:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Ulrich et al v. General Motors, LLC
as 2:2024cv11007
Plaintiff:
Cole Ulrich, Paul Aiello, Angela Bailey and others
Defendant:
General Motors, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Motor Vehicle Product Liability
Robert Bostic v. Sumter County Police Department
as 24-6351
Plaintiff:
ROBERT LAWRENCE BOSTIC
Defendant:
CITY OF SUMTER COUNTY POLICE DEPARTMENT, JESSICA HATCHLEY, HEATH L. GARDNER and others
Turner v. Wilson et al
as 4:2024cv00326
Petitioner:
Ronnie Turner
Respondent:
Sharon Wilson, Richard Bland and Andrea Jacobs
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv00230
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Hendricks v. Seaton et al
as 1:2024cv00052
Plaintiff:
Monty Allen Hendricks
Defendant:
R Shane Seaton, Angela Griffen, Artie Aurthur Aguilar, Jr and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
