(PS) Maxey v. Clinton et al
| James C. Maxey- VEXATIOUS LITIGANT |
| Darrell Steinberg, Benjamin Wagner, Dianne Feinstein, National Democrat Party, Patricia Staines, Ramona Williams, Barbara Boxer, Edmund G. Brown, Department of the Air Force, Hillary Clinton, Robert M. Maxey, Barack Obama, State of California, Kamala D. Harris, Janet Reno, William J. Clinton, Kevin Johnson, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Robert W. Maxey, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Eric Holder and United States of America |
| 2:2015cv01018 |
| May 11, 2015 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| John A Mendez |
| P.I.: Other |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 18, 2016. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 7
JUDGMENT dated *2/18/16* pursuant to order signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/17/16. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing 6
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 2/17/16: The proposed Findings and Recommendations are ADOPTED. The complaint is dismissed without leave to amend. The Clerk is directed to close this case. (Kaminski, H)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Judgment, #6 Order, served on James C. Maxey. (Kaminski, H) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER AND FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/3/15 ORDERING that plaintiff's requests for leave to proceed in forma pauperis, filed in the above-entitled actions, are granted; Further, it is RECOMMENDED that the complaints filed in the above-entitled cases be dismissed without leave to amend, and the Clerk be directed to close the above-entitled cases. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections due within fourteen days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Becknal, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Order served on James C. Maxey- VEXATIOUS LITIGANT. (Becknal, R) |
|
Filing 4
RELATED CASE ORDER signed by Judge John A. Mendez on 5/14/2015, Relating Case(s) 2:15-CV-552 JAM EFB PS and 2:15-CV-1006 KJM AC PS; REASSIGNING CASES 2:15-CV-1006 KJM AC PS and 2:15-CV-1018 GEB AC PS, to Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for all further proceedings; Judge Garland E. Burrell, Jr., and Magistrate Judge Allison Claire no longer assigned to case 2:15-CV-1018; all further proceedings and any dates currently set in this reassigned case ONLY are hereby VACATED; New Case Number: 2:15-CV-1018 JAM EFB PS.(Reader, L)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Related Case Order, served on James C. Maxey. (Reader, L) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of RELATED CASE 2:15-cv-00552, 2:15-cv-01006, 2:15-cv-01019 by United States of America. Attorney Ernce, Lynn Trinka added. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Ernce, Lynn) |
| APPLICATION TO PROCEED IFP filed - Action Required. (Meuleman, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by James C. Maxey. (Meuleman, A) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Barbara Boxer, Edmund G. Brown, Hillary Clinton, William J. Clinton, Department of the Air Force, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Dianne Feinstein, Kamala D. Harris, Eric Holder, Kevin Johnson, Kaiser Foundation Hospital, Robert W. Maxey, Robert M. Maxey, National Democrat Party, Barack Obama, Janet Reno, Patricia Staines, State of California, Darrell Steinberg, United States of America, Benjamin Wagner, Ramona Williams by James C. Maxey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Meuleman, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
