Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Johnson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 3:2026cv03053
Petitioner:
Bruce Kevin Johnson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Johnson v. Director, TDCJ-CID
as 6:2026cv00423
Petitioner:
Bruce Kevin Johnson
Respondent:
Director, TDCJ-CID
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2026cv01496
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Employment Discrimination
Townsend v. Morris et al
as 1:2026cv24950
Plaintiff:
William Alexander Townsend
Defendant:
Leroy Morris, Pamela Simpkins, Ptero/Pterodactyl Productions and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Federal Question
Kevin Johnson v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv02152
Plaintiff:
Kevin Johnson
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Interested Party:
SSA-Office of the General Counsel
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Review Agency Decision
Luckett v. Johnson et al
as 2:2026cv01401
Plaintiff:
Roland Luckett
Defendant:
Kevin Johnson and Penske Truck Leasing Co., L.P.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Tort/Motor Vehicle (P.I.)
Valerie Flores v. Willie Thomas, et al
as 26-2192
Plaintiff:
VALERIE L. FLORES
Defendant:
WILLIE TERRELL THOMAS, CHRIS JENKINS, DEBRADRE JACKSON and others
JOHNSON v. CITY OF DURHAM et al
as 1:2026cv00379
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JOHNSON
Defendant:
CITY OF DURHAM, OFFICER JACK CATES and GEORGE BRYANT
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Flores v. Thomas
as 26-1075
Plaintiff:
VALERIE L. FLORES
Defendant:
CHRIS JENKINS, DEBRADRE JACKSON, ERIC PERKINS and others
Flores v. Thomas et al
as 3:2026cv00301
Plaintiff:
Valerie L. Flores
Defendant:
Willie Terrell Thomas, Chris Jenkins, Debradre Jackson and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1514
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
