Cases 1 - 8 of 8
JOHNSON v. SHOP-VAC CORPORATION
as 3:2019cv14834
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JOHNSON
Defendant:
SHOP-VAC CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
JOHNSON v. ABBOTT LABORATORIES et al
as 2:2018cv07750
Plaintiff:
KEVIN JOHNSON
Defendant:
ABBOTT LABORATORIES, ASTRAZENECA PHARMACEUTICALS LP, ASTRAZENECA LP and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
ESTATE OF LORA JOHNSON et al v. DAIICHI SANKYO, INC. et al
as 1:2016cv03853
Plaintiff:
ESTATE OF LORA JOHNSON , KEVIN JOHNSON and HAROLD JOHNSON
Defendant:
DAIICHI SANKYO, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO U.S. HOLDINGS, INC., DAIICHI SANKYO CO., LTD. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2013cv05700
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
WEBB v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2012cv03592
Plaintiff:
AL-QUADIR WEBB
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK , NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT , SAMUEL A. DEMAIO and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
JOHNSON et al v. TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC. et al
as 1:2012cv01757
Plaintiff:
RODERICK KEVIN JOHNSON and DEBORAH JOHNSON
Defendant:
TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS AMERICA, INC. and TAKEDA PHARMACEUTICALS NORTH AMERICA, INC.
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
NEW JERSEY FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, NEWARK LODGE NO.12 et al v. CITY OF NEWARK et al
as 2:2012cv00646
Plaintiff:
NEW JERSEY FRATERNAL ORDER OF POLICE, NEWARK LODGE NO.12 , NEWARK POLICE SUPERIOR OFFICERS ASSOCIATION , NEWARK POLICE OFFICERS and others
Defendant:
CITY OF NEWARK, NEWARK POLICE DEPARTMENT, GARRY MCCARTHY and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
NGUYET-THU NGUYEN et al v. CHEESECAKE FACTORY, INC. et al
as 1:2010cv00849
Plaintiff:
NGUYET-THU NGUYEN and THOMAS LAWLER
Defendant:
CHEESECAKE FACTORY, INC., KEVIN JOHNSON, JOHN DOE(S) (1-10) OWNERS and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Personal Injury
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
