Hatchett v. Gonzalez et al
| Cecil Jerome Hatchett |
| Gonzalez and Soto |
| 2:2016cv00412 |
| February 25, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Los Angeles |
| Craig M. Kellison |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
42
ORDER ADOPTING 39 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS from page 1 through page 4, line 11 signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/11/2018 GRANTING Respondent's 34 Motion to Dismiss to the extent respondent seeks dismissal for lack of jurisdiction; This action is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 2254; All other pending 30 & 31 Motions are DENIED as moot. No certificate of appealability shall issue. CASE CLOSED. (Fabillaran, J)
|
|
Filing
39
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 03/29/18 RECOMMENDING respondents motion todismiss 34 be granted and all other pending motions 30 , 31 be denied as moot. Motions 30 , 31 and 34 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Craig M. Kellison on 3/30/2017 DENYING petitioner's 6 motion to proceed ifp as incomplete; petitioner shall submit, within 30 days, a complete application to proceed IFP, or pay the appropriate filing fee; the Clerk shall send petitioner a new ifp form; and petitioner's 4 motion for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
