Gomez v. Target Corporation
| Armando Gomez |
| Target Corporation |
| 2:2016cv01777 |
| July 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| John A. Mendez |
| Employment |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/29/17: This action shall be dismissed with prejudice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a)(1)(A)(ii). Each party shall bear his or its own attorneys' fees and costs. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
26
STIPULATION and ORDER OF DISMISSAL OF SECOND CLAIM FOR RELIEF signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 9/12/17. IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that the second claim for relief, for Breach of Express Contract, set forth in paragraphs 28 through 32 of the Com plaint for Damages filed by Plaintiff Armando Gomez against Defendant Target Corporation, shall be DISMISSED WITH PREJUDICE. Plaintiff shall not pursue any claim, damage or injury arising out of or asserting the existence and/or breach of any express contract allegedly entered into between Plaintiff and Target Corporation.(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 08/21/17 ORDERING that that the 13 Motion to Compel is GRANTED as follows: Plaintiff Armando Gomez shall conduct a complete, diligent search and reasonable inquiry for all relevant documents re sponsive to Defendant's Requests for Production,Set One, and produce all responsive documents within 10 days, including all responsive documents in his possession, custody, or control. Plaintiff shall provide a declaration, signed under penalty of perjury, within 10 days, that describes in detail the search conducted in compliance with this Order as detailed in the order. (Benson, A.)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Gomez v. Target Corporation | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Plaintiff: Armando Gomez | |
| Represented By: | Amanda De Alba Zamorano, NACAED |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Defendant: Target Corporation | |
| Represented By: | Michael A. Aparicio |
| Represented By: | Julia Brodsky |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
