Garland v. California Department of Corrections et al
| Thomas Garland |
| California Department of Corrections, Rashev and Pierce |
| 2:2016cv01856 |
| August 5, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Allison Claire |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
52
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 11/5/2018 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice for failure to prosecute. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 8/21/2018 ORDERING, within 21 days after the filing date of this order, plaintiff shall file and serve a statement indicating whether he intends to proceed with this action. If plaintiff notifies this court that he intends to proceed with this action, the court will set a new dispositive motion deadline. If plaintiff fails to respond to this order, and the order is not returned as undeliverable by the U.S. Postal Service, the undersigne d will recommend that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 110. If attempted service of this order is unsuccessful, thus preventing plaintiff's response, plaintiff's failure to notify this court of his current address within 63 days after the order was returned by the U.S. Postal Service shall result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice pursuant to Local Rule 183(b). (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
49
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 8/14/2018 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED Before 4:00 PM on Monday, 8/20/2018, plaintiff shall call Courtroom Deputy Pete Buzo at (916) 930-4128 to inform him: whether plaintiff wishes to proceed with the settlement conference on 8/22, and, if he does, whether plaintiff will participate by telephone or in person; if plaintiff does not comply with this order, the settlement conference will be removed from the court's calendar. (Reader, L)
|
|
Filing
47
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/13/18 ORDERING the dispositive motion deadline is VACATED. No dispositive motions shall be filed in this case until further order of this court. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
46
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 6/6/2018 ORDERING that within 30 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall return the attached form advising the court how he would like to appear at the settlement conference. (Hunt, G)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 06/05/18 ORDERING ( Settlement Conference set for 8/22/2018 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 27 (DB) before Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes.) Parties are directed to submit confidential settlement statement s no later than August15, 2018 to dborders@caed.uscourts.gov. Plaintiff may mail his confidential settlement statement Attn: Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes, USDC CAED, 501 IStreet, Suite 4-200, Sacramento, California 95814 so it arrives no late r than August 15,2018. The envelope shall be marked CONFIDENTIAL SETTLEMENT STATEMENT. Parties are also directed to file a Notice of Submission of Confidential Settlement Statement (See L.R. 270(d)). (cc: DB) (Plummer, M) Modified on 6/6/2018 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing
44
ORDER and FURTHER AMENDED DISCOVERY AND SCHEDULING ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/24/2017 GRANTING plaintiff's 41 undisputed request to extend deadlines: Discovery is extended to 4/20/2018; Pretrial motions, except motions to compel discovery, shall be filed on or before 7/20/2018. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/18/2017 ORDERING that Deputy Attorney General Lucas Hennes, counsel for both defendants, shall file and serve a response to Plaintiff's 41 Request within ten days, and include any available information about plaintiffs prospective parole date. (Hunt, G)
|
|
Filing
32
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/29/2017 RECOMMENDING that 19 Motion for Summary Judgment be denied and summary judgment on the issue of exhaustion be entered for Plaintiff. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 6/21/2017 GRANTING defendants' 30 motion to modify the 15 Discovery and Scheduling Order. The deadlines for written discovery and dispositive motions are VACATED pending further order of this court. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 2/14/2017 ORDERING plaintiff's 17 general request for discovery is DENIED without prejudice. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 10/13/16 ORDERING that that the Sheriff of Sacramento County or a designee shall collect from the prison trust account of Thomas Garland an initial partial filing fee an d shall forward the amount to the Clerk of the Court. The Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order and a copy of plaintiffs signed in forma pauperis affidavit on the Sheriff of Sacramento County. Clerk of the Court is directed to serve a copy of this order on the Financial Department of the court. (cc Financial)(Dillon, M)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Allison Claire on 09/06/16 ORDERING plaintiff shall within 30 days from the filing date of this order submit a newly completed in forma pauperis application that includes: a) completion of the certificate portion of the application and b)submission of a certified copy of plaintiff's institutional trust account statement for the 6 month period preceding the filing of his complaint. The clerk of the court is directed to send plaintiff a new application to proceed in forma pauperis by a prisoner. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
