Sutton v. Giessner, et al.
| Karimi Sutton |
| G. Giessner and N. Guzman |
| 2:2016cv02369 |
| October 4, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Lassen |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Prison Condition |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 4/1/2021 ADOPTING 40 The Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING 28 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment and DISMISSING Plaintiff's claim against them without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and The clerk of the court shall close this case. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
40
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 05/13/2020 RECOMMENDING the 28 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these Findings and Recommendations.(Tupolo, A)
|
|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/13/20 ORDERING that, within 21 days of the date of this order, plaintiff shall file either an opposition to the motion or a statement of no opposition. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
35
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/14/2020 GRANTING 34 Motion to Withdraw as Attorney; VACATING the 2/19/2020 hearing; and ORDERING Plaintiff to file a response to 28 Motion for Summary Judgment within 21 days from the date of this order. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
27
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 8/7/2019 and agreed between the parties to MODIFY the discovery and scheduling deadlines as follows: (1) Plaintiff's deposition shall be complete on or before 9/9/2019; (2) any motions necessary to compel discovery shall be filed on or before 9/16/2019; (3) dispositive motions shall be filed on or before 12/9/2019; (4) the Court will schedule pretrial proceedings, if necessary, upon the resolution of any pretrial motions filed. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
13
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Karimi Sutton signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 11/28/18. CDC shall collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial)(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/14/2018 WITHDRAWING the 7 findings and recommendations and the Clerk shall request plaintiff's Certified Prison Trust account statement from the CDCR. Upon receipt of the statement, the court will address plaintiff's ifp application. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 2/22/2018 DIRECTING the Clerk to randomly assign a U.S. District Judge to this case. Judge Kimberly J. Mueller assigned. It is RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Fabillaran, J)
|
|
Filing
6
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/16/2018 ORDERING, within 30 days, plaintiff shall submit either the filing fee or the application required by § 1915(a). The Clerk shall mail plaintiff an ifp form.(Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
