Cases 1 - 10 of 22
(PC) Abdullah v. Casaurang et al
as 2:2024cv01223
Plaintiff:
Jalaal Abdullah
Defendant:
A. Casaurang, Warden, Associate Warden and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) Ramsey v. Zetterholm et al
as 2:2024cv00034
Plaintiff:
Daniel C. Ramsey
Defendant:
S. Zetterholm, N. Guzman, A. Casaurang and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Shallowhorn v. Guzman
as 23-2155
Petitioner / Appellant:
ALFRED EUGENE SHALLOWHORN
Respondent / Appellee:
FIDENCIO N. GUZMAN
Eduardo Rios Blancarte v. Fidencio N. Guzman
as 2:2023cv02704
Petitioner:
Eduardo Rios Blancarte
Defendant:
Warden Fidenzio N Guzman and Fidencio N. Guzman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Karimi Sutton v. N. Guzman, et al
as 21-15817
Plaintiff / Appellant:
KARIMI KWAA SUTTON
Defendant / Appellee:
N. GUZMAN, Correctional Officer and G. GIESSNER, Correctional Officer
GUZMAN v. 3M COMPANY et al
as 7:2021cv01501
Defendant:
AEARO HOLDING LLC, AEARO INTERMEDIATE LLC, AEARO TECHNOLOGIES LLC and others
Plaintiff:
IVAN N GUZMAN
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Gary Perkins v. Classification Service Dept., et al
as 20-55161
Defendant / Appellee:
T. RAYBON, CCII, She is Sued Individually, RAYMOND MADDEN, Warden, He/or She is Sued Individually, F. N. GUZMAN, Associate Warden, He/or She is Sued Individually and others
Plaintiff / Appellant:
GARY RONNELL PERKINS
USA v. Angelica N. Guzman-Cordoba
as 19-2526
Defendant / Appellant:
ANGELICA N. GUZMAN-CORDOBA
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Perkins v. Classification Service Dept et al
as 3:2019cv01382
Defendant:
Classification Service Dept, DOES 1-10, Raymond Madden and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Ronnell Perkins
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr
(PC) Hunt v. Kramer et al
as 2:2018cv03025
Defendant:
C. Hahn, N. Smith, C. Gripp and others
Plaintiff:
Tyrone Hunt
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
