Starr v. CDCR, et al.,
| Robin Gillen Starr |
| CDCR, BOP and United States of America |
| 2:2016cv03033 |
| December 28, 2016 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Garland E. Burrell |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
35
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 7/11/17 recommending that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge Garland E. Burrell. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
27
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/13/2017 GRANTING petitioner's 21 request to proceed IFP. Petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus is SUMMARILY DISMISSED. Petitioner has 30 days to file an amended pe tition for a writ of habeas corpus curing the deficiencies identified in this order. The Clerk shall send petitioner the form for application for writ of habeas corpus. All outstanding motions are DENIED. The Clerks shall terminiate ECF Nos. 6 , 9 , 12 , 13 , 16 , 17 , 18 , 23 . (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 1/17/2017 ORDERING the Clerk to send petitioner a new ifp application. Petitioner shall submit, within 30 days, an affidavit to proceed ifp or the appropriate filing fee. Petitioner's failure to comply with this order may result in this action being dismissed. (Yin, K)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
