Patrick v. Pierce et al
Plaintiff: Nicholas Patrick
Defendant: Pierce, Crozier, Sanchez, Quick, Hernandez, Kaplain, Huisar, Altshuler, Perez and Chudy
Case Number: 2:2017cv01205
Filed: June 8, 2017
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Carolyn K. Delaney
Nature of Suit: Civil Rights
Cause of Action: 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
March 17, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 51 ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/16/2020 ADOPTING 50 Findings and Recommendations in full, GRANTING 39 Motion for Summary Judgment, and DISMISSING the complaint without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. CASE CLOSED. (York, M)
February 21, 2020 Opinion or Order Filing 50 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 2/21/2020 RECOMMENDING 39 Motion for Summary Judgment be granted and the complaint be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
August 20, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 47 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/20/19 DENYING 45 Motion to Compel Depositions. (Plummer, M)
August 19, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 46 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/19/19 ORDERING plaintiff shall have 21 days from the service of this order to file a response to defendants' motion for summary judgment. The 8/28/19 hearing on the motion for summary judgment is VACATED and may be re-set upon completion of briefing at the court's discretion. (Plummer, M)
July 30, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 44 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/30/2019 DENYING 41 Motion for Extension of Time and Motion to Appoint Counsel. (York, M)
July 26, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 42 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 7/26/2019 GRANTING defendants' 40 motion to modify the scheduling order. The 8/30/2019 pretrial motions deadline is VACATED and will be re-set, as necessary, upon resolution of defendants' currently pending motion for summary judgment. (Yin, K)
June 25, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/25/19 ORDERING that Defendants' objection is SUSTAINED, and the court's June 14, 2019 order is hereby VACATED as duplicative. (Kaminski, H)
June 14, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 33 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 6/13/19 GRANTING 21 Request and CONSTRUING 12 Screening Order as findings and recommendations which the court must review. Objections are GRANTED 14 days from the date of this order to file objections to the screening order. (Coll, A)
June 11, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 31 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 06/11/19 ORDERING as to 30 Motion to Compel ( Motion Hearing continued to 7/10/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney.) The defendants shall file a joint statement or appropriate affidavit at least seven days before the hearing or the hearing will be dropped and the motion dismissed without prejudice. (Plummer, M)
February 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 24 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 2/12/19 ORDERING that 22 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are adopted in full. Defendants Crozier, Hernandez, Kaplain, Pierce, Quick, Altshuler, Perez and Chudy are dismissed without prejudice. This case is referred back to the assigned magistrate judge for all further pretrial proceedings. (Kaminski, H)
January 2, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 22 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/2/2019 GRANTING defendants' 21 request for the submission of findings and recommendations to the District Judge and VACATING the dismissals of defendants Pierce, Crozier, Quick, Hernandez, Kaplain, Altshuler, Perez, and Chudy and the failure to protect claim against defendant Sanchez. IT IS FURTHER RECOMMENDED that defendants Pierce, Crozier, Quick, Hernandez, Kaplain, Altshuler, Perez, and Chudy and the failure to protect claim against defendant Sanchez be dismissed without prejudice for the reasons set forth in the August 17, 2018 screening order 12 and October 19, 2018 order directing service 16 . Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
September 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 09/20/18 ORDERING within fourteen days of service of this order, plaintiff shall complete and return the attached form notifying the court whether he wants to proceed on the screened complaint or whether he wants to file an amended complaint. (Plummer, M) Modified on 9/20/2018 (Plummer, M).
August 17, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 12 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 08/16/18 GRANTING 2 Motion to Proceed IFP and GRANTING 9 Motion to Amend the Complaint to the extent he is being given the option to amend the complaint or proceed on the cognizable claims. Plaintiff's motion to be transferred to another prison 9 is DENIED as moot. The allegations in Claim Five against Huisar for using excessive force and the components of Claims Four and Six in which Sanchez applied the handcuffs too tightly and interfered with plaintiffs mental health treatment, state valid claims for relief. All other claims and defendants are dismissed with leave to amend. Plaintiff has the option to proceed immediately on his Eighth Amendment excessive force and deli berate indifference claims against Huisar and Sanchez, or to amend the complaint. Within fourteen days of service of this order, plaintiff shall complete and return the attached form notifying the court whether he wants to proceed on the screened complaint or whether he wants to file an amended complaint. (Plummer, M)
March 20, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 7 ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/19/18 ADOPTING 6 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS: 5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction is denied as moot.(Kaminski, H)
January 31, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 6 ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/31/2018 ORDERING the Clerk to randomly assign a US District Judge to this action and RECOMMENDING plaintiff's 5 motion for preliminary injunction be denied as moot. Assigned and referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Patrick v. Pierce et al
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Plaintiff: Nicholas Patrick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Pierce
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Crozier
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Sanchez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Quick
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Hernandez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Kaplain
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Huisar
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Altshuler
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Perez
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Defendant: Chudy
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?