Belyew v. Duch et al
| Lisa Belyew |
| Duch, Hadley, Moreland, Callus, Acton, Bayonetta, Smith, Trott and Webber |
| 2:2017cv01213 |
| June 9, 2017 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Butte |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
78
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 3/16/2022 ADOPTING 73 The Findings and Recommendations in full; GRANTING 53 Defendants' Motion for Summary Judgment. Plaintiff's claims against all defendants are DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and The Clerk of Court is directed to close the case. CASE CLOSED. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing
73
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 1/26/2022 DENYING plaintiff's 71 motion for an extension of time; and RECOMMENDING defendants' 53 motion for summary judgment be granted; plainti ff's claims against all defendants be dismissed without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies; and the Clerk of Court be directed to close the case. Referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
55
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 7/21/21 ORDERING within 7 days of the date of this order, defendants shall reserve their motion for summary judgment on plaintiff at her of record: Lisa Marie Belyew, WG-0016Central California W omens Facility (1508), PO Box 1508, Chowchilla, CA 93610-1508. Defendants shall file with the court, within seven days of this order, a new proof of service. Within twenty-one days of service, plaintiff shall file either an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to defendants motion. Defendants may file a reply to plaintiffs opposition, if any, 7 days thereafter.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
52
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 7/7/21 ADOPTING in full 51 Findings and Recommendations and DENYING 48 plaintiff's Motion to Amend the Complaint. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
51
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 6/02/21 DENYING 43 Motion to Compel. Also, RECOMMENDING that plaintiff's motion to amend 48 be denied. Motion to Amend 48 referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
40
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 10/6/2020 DENYING plaintiff's 35 motion to compel. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
31
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 03/18/20 DENYING 28 , 29 , 30 plaintiff's requests for service of subpoenas. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
20
ORDER signed by District Judge John A. Mendez on 8/8/2019 ADOPTING 19 Findings and Recommendations in full and DISMISSING without prejudice plaintiff's claims against defendants Soderberg, Ramirez, Dawson, Young, Proctor, and Meyer. (York, M)
|
|
Filing
19
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/11/2019 ORDERING the Clerk to randomly assign a US District Judge to this case and RECOMMENDING plaintiff's claims against defendants Soderberg, Ramirez, Dawson, Young, Proctor, and Meyer be dismissed without prejudice. Assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
8
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Lisa Belyew signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 6/18/2018. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and forward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial) (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 06/27/17 ordering plaintiff has 30 days from the date of service of this order to submit either the filing fee or the application required by section 1915(a). The clerk of the court is directed to mail to plaintiff a form application for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Plummer, M)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
