Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Smuda v. Smith et al
as 0:2026cv04688
Defendant:
James Gilbertson, James Alsdurf, Malcolm Whynott and others
Plaintiff:
Ricky Allen Smuda
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith Krivoshey PC et al v. Clelland et al
as 8:2026cv03223
Defendant:
Kodama Farms LLC, WM Wholesale LLC, AK Futures LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Kazerouni Law Group APC and Smith Krivoshey PC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question
SMITH v. NCL (Bahamas) Ltd
as 1:2026cv27787
Defendant:
NCL (Bahamas) Ltd
Plaintiff:
JERRI SMITH
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1333 Admiralty
Smith v. Commissioner of Social Security
as 2:2026cv00544
Defendant:
Commissioner of Social Security
Plaintiff:
Cordney Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00921
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1692 Fair Debt Collection Act
Brockman et al v. Black Duck Software, Inc.
as 3:2026cv12979
Defendant:
Black Duck Software, Inc.
Plaintiff:
Meredith Smith and Elizabeth Brockman
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Account Receivable
Smith v. Pope et al
as 3:2026cv00859
Defendant:
Lyon County, William McDaniel, Travis Masterson and others
Plaintiff:
Gary Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Smith v. Traylor et al
as 6:2026cv00396
Defendant:
Noemi Keiko Jarratt and Talan Traylor
Plaintiff:
Ricky Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Smith v. Five Unknown Named Leflore County, Mississippi Sheriff's Deputies
as 4:2026cv00257
Defendant:
Five Unknown Named Leflore County, Mississippi Sheriff's Deputies
Plaintiff:
Curtis Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 pr Prisoner Civil Rights
SMITH v. JAMES
as 1:2026cv01294
Respondent:
WARDEN JAMEL JAMES
Petitioner:
Wesley Tobe Smith
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
