Davis v. Seihel et al
| Jerome Markiel Davis |
| Kimberly A. Seihel, J. Harrison, T. Kirby, Walker, S. Bristow and Albertson |
| 2:2018cv01261 |
| May 14, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Edmund F. Brennan |
| Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
50
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/3/2020 ADOPTING in full 48 Findings and Recommendations. Defendant Harrison's 43 Motion for Summary Judgment is GRANTED and Plaintiff's claim against him is DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. CASE CLOSED (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
48
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 05/05/20 RECOMMENDING that defendant Harrisons motion for summary judgment 43 be GRANTED and plaintiffs claim against him be DISMISSED without prejudice for failure to exhaust administrative remedies. Motion for Summary Judgment 43 referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
45
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 3/30/2020 GRANTING 44 Motion to Modify 37 Scheduling Order. The current deadline for filing all dispositive motions is stayed until 45 days after 43 Motion for Summary Judgment has been decided. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing
42
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 2/11/2020 ADOPTING 41 Findings and Recommendations in full and DENYING plaintiff's 40 Motion for a temporary restraining order and/or preliminary injunction. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing
41
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 12/12/2019 RECOMMENDING plaintiff's 40 motion for preliminary injunction be denied. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
32
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 8/15/19 ADOPTING the findings and recommendations filed 6/25/19, (ECF No. 21 ), in full; and DISMISSING Plaintiff's claims against defendants Seihel and Kirby without prejudice. (Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing
31
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 06/25/19 RECOMMENDING that plaintiffs claims against defendants Seihel and Kirby be dismissed without prejudice. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/25/19 ADOPTING in full 17 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS and DENYING 16 Plaintiff's motion for emergency injunctive relief. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing
18
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Jerome Markiel Davis signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 10/18/2018. CDCR shall collect an initial partial filing fee and thereafter the balance in monthly payments and for ward to the Clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. The Clerk is directed to serve this order and copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDCR. The Clerk shall also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDCR, Financial) (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
3
ORDER Transferring Case to the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California, signed by Magistrate Judge Stanley A. Boone on 5/16/18. New Case Number 2:18-cv-01261-EFB. Old Case Number 1:18-cv-0657-SAB. (Gonzalez, R)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
