Williams v. Filson
| Marcell Williams |
| Timothy Filson |
| 2:2018cv01305 |
| May 21, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| Sacramento |
| Kendall J. Newman |
| General |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Follow case documents by RSS
Available Case Documents
The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing
36
ORDER signed by Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 5/23/2022 ADOPTING 30 Findings and Recommendations in full, and DENYING 1 Application for a Writ of Habeas Corpus. The court DECLINES to issue the certificate of appealability. CASE CLOSED. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing
30
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 09/03/21 RECOMMENDING that petitioner's application for a writ of habeas corpus be denied. Referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days.(Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing
28
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 2/16/2021 DENYING without prejudice petitioner's 27 motion for appointment of counsel. The Clerk is directed to change petitioner's address of record as noted in his 12/29/2020 filing. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
25
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/5/2019 DENYING petitioner's 19 motion and GRANTING petitioner 60 days to file a reply/traverse to respondent's answer. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
9
ORDER signed by District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller on 3/5/19 ORDERING that 7 FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS are adopted in full. 6 Motion to Stay is denied, and petitioner is ordered to file an amended petition raising only his exhausted claims (1) and (5) within thirty days. The court declines to issue the certificate of appealability. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing
7
ORDER, FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 9/17/2018 ORDERING petitioner's 2 motion to proceed IFP is GRANTED; the Clerk shall assign a district judge to this case; and petitioner's 6 reques t for appointment of counsel is DENIED without prejudice. IT IS RECOMMENDED that petitioner's 6 motion for stay be denied, and petitioner be ordered to file an petition raising only his exhausted claims (1) and (5) within 30 days of an order adopting these findings and recommendations. Assigned and referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing
5
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 6/5/18: Within thirty days from the date of this order, petitioner shall file a motion to stay this action to return to state court and exhaust his state court remedies as to his unexhausted claims. (Kaminski, H)
|
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
| Search for this case: Williams v. Filson | |
|---|---|
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Petitioner: Marcell Williams | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
| Respondent: Timothy Filson | |
| Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
| Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
| Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
