Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Williams v. Filson, et al.
as 26-3090
Petitioner:
RONALD WILLIAMS
Respondent:
TIMOTHY FILSON and NEVADA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS OFFENDER MANAGEMENT DIVISION
Williams v. Filson et al
as 2:2026cv00975
Petitioner:
Ronald Williams
Respondent:
Timothy Filson and Offender Management Division State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
Greene v. Bean, et al.
as 25-1781
Petitioner:
TRAVERS ARTHUR GREENE
Respondent:
JEREMY BEAN, TIMOTHY FILSON and AARON D. FORD
Emil v. Gittere, et al.
as 24-3080
Petitioner:
RODNEY L. EMIL
Respondent:
WILLIAM GITTERE, ADAM PAUL LAXALT and TIMOTHY FILSON
Conners v. Filson, et al.
as 24-2170
Petitioner:
DARRELL CONNERS
Respondent:
TIMOTHY FILSON and ATTORNEY GENERAL OF THE STATE OF NEVADA
Durand v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 24-1406
Plaintiff:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, DR EXUM and others
Durand v. State of Nevada, et al.
as 23-1630
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
STATE OF NEVADA, ELY STATE PRISON, DR EXUM and others
Torrez v. Filson et al
as 3:2023cv00159
Petitioner:
Richard Raymond Torrez
Respondent:
Warden Timothy Filson and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Roberto Durand v. Nevada, State of, et al
as 23-15280
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ROBERTO DURAND
Defendant / Appellee:
NEVADA, STATE OF, terminated per #9 FAC, ELY STATE PRISON, terminated per #9 FAC, EXUM, Dr. terminated per #9 FAC and others
Alfonso Blake v. James Dzurenda, et al
as 23-15151
Plaintiff / Appellant:
ALFONSO MANUEL BLAKE
Defendant / Appellee:
JAMES DZURENDA, Party removed pursuant to Order No. 47, RICHARD SNYDER, [49] Suggestion of Death, WILLIAM GITTERE, Warden, Substituted in for Warden Timothy Filson per ECF No. 34 Minute Order and others
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
