Hatchett v. Soto
Petitioner: Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Respondent: Soto
Case Number: 2:2018cv01773
Filed: June 20, 2018
Court: US District Court for the Eastern District of California
Office: Sacramento Office
County: Sacramento
Presiding Judge: Deborah Barnes
Nature of Suit: General
Cause of Action: 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254
Jury Demanded By: None

Available Case Documents

The following documents for this case are available for you to view or download:

Date Filed Document Text
July 22, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 40 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 7/19/2019 GRANTING 39 Motion for Extension of Time. Respondent to file response to 36 and 37 Objections to 35 Findings and Recommendations on or before 8/1/2019. (Henshaw, R)
July 12, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 38 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 07/12/19 ORDERING within 10 days of the filed date of this order, respondent shall file a response to petitioner's objections. (Plummer, M)
June 6, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 35 FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 06/05/19 RECOMMENDING that respondent's motion to dismiss 21 be granted. Petitioner's pending motions 25 , 26 , and 31 be denied as moot; and the petition for writ of habeas corpus be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction. Motions 21 , 25 , 26 , 31 referred to Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. Objections due within 14 days. (Plummer, M)
April 3, 2019 Opinion or Order Filing 28 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 4/1/2019 ORDERING, within 20 days, respondent shall file a response to the questions raised by the court in this order. Within 20 days of service of respondent's filing, petitioner may file a response. (Yin, K)
December 3, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 15 ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 11/30/18 GRANTING 7 Motion to Proceed IFP and DIRECTING respondent to file a response to 6 First Amended Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus within 60 days from the date of this order. If the response is an answer, petitioner's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within 30 days after service of the answer. If the response is a motion, petitioner's opposition or statement of non-opposition shall be filed and served within 30 days after service of the motion, and respondent's reply, if any, shall be filed and served within 14 days thereafter. (cc Tami Krenzin, Supervising Deputy Attorney) (Coll, A)
October 26, 2018 Opinion or Order Filing 11 ORDER to SHOW CAUSE signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 10/25/2018 ORDERING petitioner to show cause why the petition should not be dismissed for petitioner's failure to exhaust state remedies. Petitioner shall inform the court what claims have been presented to the California Supreme Court within 30 days of the date of service of this order. (Yin, K)
Access additional case information on PACER

Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.

Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System

Search for this case: Hatchett v. Soto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Petitioner: Cecil Jerome Hatchett
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]
Respondent: Soto
Search News [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ]
Search Finance [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ]
Search Web [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ]

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?