(PC) Smith v. San Joaquin County Sheriff's Department
| Rick Smith and Ricky Paul Smith |
| San Joaquin County Sheriff's Department |
| 2:2018cv01998 |
| July 20, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Sacramento Office |
| San Joaquin |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 16 NOTICE re current housing location by Ricky Paul Smith (Coll, A) |
Filing 15
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/30/2018 DENYING without prejudice plaintiff's #14 motion for the appointment of counsel. (Yin, K)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #15 Order on Motion to Appoint Counsel served on Ricky Paul Smith. (Yin, K) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/28/2018 DENYING as moot #12 Request for Order and ORDERING Plaintiff to comply with #11 Order on or before 9/14/2018. (Henshaw, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #13 Order served on Ricky Paul Smith. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 14 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Ricky Paul Smith. (Zignago, K.) Modified on 8/29/2018 (Plummer, M). |
| Filing 12 REQUEST for ORDER by Ricky Paul Smith. (York, M) |
|
Filing 11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/14/2018 ORDERING Plaintiff to submit, within 30 days from the date of this order, a completed affidavit in support of his request to proceed IFP and a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the 6 month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint and DENYING without prejudice #8 Motion for the Appointment of Counsel. (Henshaw, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #11 Order and IFP application served on Ricky Paul Smith. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 10 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Ricky Paul Smith. (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 9 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Ricky Paul Smith. (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Ricky Paul Smith. (Kastilahn, A) |
| Filing 7 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 8/23/2018. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Marrujo, C) |
| Filing 6 CASE TRANSFERRED IN from District of California Northern; Case Number 4:18-cv-03677. |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Rick Smith. (Marrujo, C) |
|
Filing 5
ORDER TRANSFERRING CASE. Case transferred to the Eastern District of California. Signed by Magistrate Judge Kandis A. Westmore on 7/18/18. (Attachments: #1 Certificate/Proof of Service)(sisS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 7/18/2018) [Transferred from cand on 7/20/2018.]
|
| Filing 4 MOTION for Leave to Proceed in forma pauperis filed by Rick Smith. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(cjlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/25/2018) [Transferred from cand on 7/20/2018.] |
| Filing 3 CLERK'S NOTICE re completion of In Forma Pauperis affidavit or payment of filing fee due within 28 days. IFP Form due by 7/30/2018. (jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2018) [Transferred from cand on 7/20/2018.] |
| Filing 2 CONSENT to Proceed Before a US Magistrate Judge by Rick Smith. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2018) [Transferred from cand on 7/20/2018.] |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against San Joaquin County Sheriff's Department. Filed by Rick Smith. Consent/Declination due by 7/20/2018. (Attachments: #1 Envelope)(jmlS, COURT STAFF) (Filed on 6/20/2018) [Transferred from cand on 7/20/2018.] |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
