Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Williams et al v. Smith (MAG+)
as 2:2025cv01027
Plaintiff:
Wonya Williams and Joe Ranger Pickett
Defendant:
Rick Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Damond v. St. Tammany Parish Government et al
as 2:2025cv02527
Plaintiff:
Glenn Damond
Defendant:
St. Tammany Parish Government, Mike B Cooper, Joe Impastato and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Zorn v. Smith (MAG+)
as 2:2025cv00336
Plaintiff:
Roger James Zorn, Sr.
Defendant:
Rick Smith
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Romo v. City of Portales et al
as 2:2024cv01216
Defendant:
Nicholas Jackson, Haley Levy, Jesus Gabriza and others
Plaintiff:
Anthony Ray Romo
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Robinson v. Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department et al
as 3:2024cv00829
Defendant:
J. Duggins, Rick Smith and Charlotte Mecklenburg Police Department
Plaintiff:
Cordaryl Robinson
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Parr v. Cougle
as 24-30523
Plaintiff:
William R. McHugh, III, Rebecca Taylor and Anthony Parr
Intervenor:
Jeffery Corbin, Rick Smith, Larry Rolling and others
Defendant:
David Cougle
Soto v. Doe
as 2:2024cv00774
Plaintiff:
Narcizo Soto
Defendant:
John Doe, Rafael Aguilar, Nick Sanchez and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Mullis v. J.P. Morgan Chase & Co. et al
as 3:2024cv01334
Defendant:
Neology Inc., J.P. Morgan Chase & Co., Francisco Martinez De Velasco and others
Plaintiff:
Joseph N. Mullis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1446 fr Notice of Removal - Fraud
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2024cv00677
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 12117 ad - Americans with Disabilities Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 24-3226
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Intervenor:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
