(PC) Joseph v. Rahimifar et al
| Joseph Alonzo and Alonzo Joseph |
| Majid Rahimifar, Enenmott, Schaffer, D. Anderson and Leo P. Langlois |
| 2:2018cv02617 |
| September 24, 2018 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Edmund F Brennan |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on September 28, 2018. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 6
ORDER of INTRADISTRICT TRANSFER from Sacramento (2:18-cv-2617 EFB) to Fresno (1:18-cv-1338 GSA) signed by Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan on 9/27/2018. (Henshaw, R)
|
| Filing 5 AMENDED PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 10/29/2018. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Coll, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #5 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Alonzo Joseph. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 4 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 10/29/2018. (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent) (Coll, A) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Joseph Alonzo. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Joseph Alonzo. (Coll, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Joseph Alonzo. (Coll, A) Modified on 9/26/2018 (Plummer, M). |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Joseph Alonzo.(Coll, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
