Cases 1 - 10 of 100
SCHAFFER v. FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
as 2:2026cv12131
Plaintiff:
CARLON SCHAFFER
Defendant:
FEDERAL EXPRESS CORPORATION
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 2 (a) Fair Labor Standards Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv01379
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Green v. State of New York et al
as 1:2026cv07505
Plaintiff:
Melvin Green
Defendant:
State of New York, Darcel Clark, Devin B. Horzempa and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 pr Fed. Question: Federal Prisoner Civil Rights
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00087
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 621 Job Discrimination (Age)
VANDRISH v. SCHAFFER et al
as 1:2026cv00190
Plaintiff:
SHARON ANN VANDRISH
Defendant:
STEPHANIE VETTENBERG SCHAFFER, JOHN PAVLOCK, MARIA MEDINA and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 5:2026cv01364
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Jones v. The City of Blue Ash et al
as 1:2026cv00730
Plaintiff:
Elwood H Jones
Defendant:
The City of Blue Ash, Robert S. Lilley, James D. Schaffer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Schaffer v. Commissioner Social Security Administration
as 3:2026cv01283
Plaintiff:
Sean M Schaffer
Defendant:
Commissioner Social Security Administration
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 205 Denial Social Security Benefits
Schaffer v. Casely Inc et al
as 3:2026cv05667
Plaintiff:
Tabitha Schaffer
Defendant:
Does 1-10 and Casely Inc
Cause Of Action: 47 U.S.C. § 227 Restrictions of Use of Telephone Equipment
SCHAFFER v. THE HARTFORD et al
as 2:2026cv00313
Plaintiff:
HEATHER SCHAFFER
Defendant:
THE HARTFORD and HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1132 E.R.I.S.A.-Employee Benefits
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
