Fisher et al v. Target Corporation
Catherine Fisher and Donald Fisher |
Target Corporation |
2:2019cv00114 |
January 16, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Kendall J Newman |
Troy L Nunley |
P.I.: Other |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on February 16, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 22 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 3/15/2019: On the Court's own motion, Plaintiffs' Motion to Remand and Motion for Order Granting Leave to Amend Complaint (ECF No. #13 ) is hereby SUBMITTED without oral argument. Accordingly, the hearing set for 3/21/2019 is VACATED. If the Court determines oral argument is necessary, it will be scheduled at a later date. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Krueger, M) |
Filing 21 AFFIDAVIT re #20 Declaration, #19 Reply Affidavit re Service by Catherine Fisher. (Demas, John) |
Filing 20 DECLARATION of Nicholas J. Loncarich in support of #13 Motion to Remand and Amend. (Demas, John) |
Filing 19 REPLY by Catherine Fisher re #13 Motion to Remand and Amend. (Demas, John) |
Filing 18 DECLARATION of Zachary Leibold in opposition to #13 Motion to Remand and Amend. (Sordello, Richard) |
Filing 17 OPPOSITION by Target Corporation to #13 Motion to Remand and Amend. (Sordello, Richard) |
Filing 16 PROPOSED First Amended Complaint by Catherine Fisher. (Schultz, Bradley) Modified on 2/19/2019 (Kastilahn, A). |
Filing 15 PROPOSED ORDER #13 Motion to Remand and Amend. (Schultz, Bradley) Modified on 2/19/2019 (Kastilahn, A). |
Filing 14 DECLARATION of Nicholas J. Loncarich in support of #13 Motion to Remand and Amend. (Schultz, Bradley) Modified on 2/19/2019 (Kastilahn, A). |
Filing 13 MOTION to REMAND and Motion for Order Granting Leave to Amend Complaint by Catherine Fisher. Motion Hearing set for 3/21/2019 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Schultz, Bradley) |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 1/25/2019: The Court has received Plaintiff's Request to Substitute Defendant's True Name for Fictitious Name (ECF No. #11 ). Plaintiff is directed to file a properly noticed motion to amend the complaint under Fed. R. Civ. Pro. 15 and Local Rule 230. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Krueger, M) |
Filing 11 REQUEST to Substitute Defendant's True Name for Fictitious Name by Catherine Fisher. (Schultz, Bradley) |
Filing 10 DEMAND for TRIAL by JURY by Catherine Fisher. (Schultz, Bradley) |
Filing 9 NOTICE of Entry of Initial Pre-Trial Scheduling Order by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Sordello, Richard) |
Filing 8 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Coll, A) |
Filing 7 NOTICE to Adverse Party of Removal of Action by Target Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Notice) (Sordello, Richard) |
Filing 6 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Target Corporation. (Sordello, Richard) |
Filing 5 DECLARATION of Richard J. Sordello, Esq. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit) (Sordello, Richard) |
Filing 4 ANSWER with Jury Demand by Target Corporation. (Sordello, Richard) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Target Corporation. (Sordello, Richard) |
Filing 2 CIVIL COVER SHEET by Target Corporation. (Sordello, Richard) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Sacramento, case number 34-2018-00243770 by Target Corporation. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8064810) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit)(Sordello, Richard) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.