(PS) Selck v. Department of Social Services et al
Morrey Selck |
California Department of Social Services, Department of Social Services, Mark Williams and Xavier Castro |
2:2019cv00935 |
May 23, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Edmund F Brennan |
Troy L Nunley |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1981 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 24, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 15 SECOND AMENDED COMPLAINT against California Department of Social Services, Xavier Castro, Department of Social Services, Mark Williams by Morrey Selck.(Mena-Sanchez, L) |
Filing 14 MOTION to conduct investigation by Morrey Selck. (Kaminski, H) |
Filing 13 MOTION to DISMISS by California Department of Social Services. Motion Hearing set for 7/31/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Memorandum)(Wong, Judy) Modified on 6/20/2019 (Coll, A). |
Filing 12 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy M. Krueger for District Judge Troy L. Nunley on 6/19/2019: Pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(21), Defendant California Department of Social Services' Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. #11 ) shall be noticed before the assigned Magistrate Judge. Counsel for Defendant shall contact the Clerk for Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan for available law and motion dates, and re-notice the motion before the Magistrate Judge with the proper time and date. Accordingly, the 7/25/2019 hearing before District Judge Troy L. Nunley is VACATED. (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Krueger, M) |
Filing 11 MOTION to DISMISS by California Department of Social Services. Motion Hearing set for 7/25/2019 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 2 (TLN) before District Judge Troy L. Nunley. (Attachments: #1 Memorandum, #2 Memorandum)(Wong, Judy) Modified on 6/20/2019 (Coll, A). |
Filing 10 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by California Department of Social Services. (Wong, Judy) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: 12 Minute Order served on Morrey Selck. (Krueger, M) |
Filing 9 FIRST AMENDED COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Morrey Selck.(Coll, A) |
Filing 8 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Judy Yuen-Ting Wong on behalf of California Department of Social Services. Attorney Wong, Judy Yuen-Ting added. (Wong, Judy) |
Filing 7 NOTICE re complaint by Morrey Selck. (Coll, A) |
Filing 6 MOTION to RELIEVE CONSERVATORSHIP and NOTICE of RELATED CASE 2:18-cv-02447-JAM-EFB by Morrey Selck. (York, M) |
Filing 5 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Morrey Selck. (York, M) |
Filing 4 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Morrey Selck. (Becknal, R) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 11/6/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 8 (EFB) before Magistrate Judge Edmund F. Brennan. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Benson, A.) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *California Department of Social Services, Xavier Castro, Department of Social Services, Mark Williams* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Morrey Selck* *1200 North B Street* *Sacramento, CA 95823*. (Benson, A.) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT against All Defendants by Morrey Selck. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Benson, A.) |
RECEIPT number #CAE200098356 $400.00 fbo Morrey Selck by Morrey Selck on 5/23/2019. (Benson, A.) |
SERVICE AT COUNTER: #2 Summons, CAED Receipt and #3 Civil New Case Documents for TLN served on Morrey Selck. (Benson, A.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.