Cases 1 - 10 of 544
Fidler v. O'Malley
as 4:2024cv00586
Plaintiff:
Mark William Fidler, Sr.
Defendant:
Martin O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (SSID)
Van Wyen v. Thor Motor Coach Inc et al
as 3:2024cv00242
Plaintiff:
Mark William VanWyen
Defendant:
Thor Motor Coach Inc and Mercedes-Benz USA LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
David Delgado v. Latoya Hughes, et al
as 24-1407
Plaintiff:
DAVID DELGADO
Defendant:
LATOYA HUGHES, MARK WILLIAMS, JASON GARZA and others
Ollie v. Ek et al
as 4:2024cv04043
Plaintiff:
Robert Ollie, Jr
Defendant:
Jonathan Ek, Kurt Osmundson, D Meyer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Uhuru v. Bonnifield, et al.
as 24-775
Plaintiff:
KOHEN DIALLO E. UHURU
Defendant:
JIM BONNIFIELD, Community Resource Manager, individual and official capacity, JOSIE GASTELO, Warden, individual and official capacity, H. WARREN ALDERSON, and Predecessor, Protestant Chaplain, individual and official capacity and others
Fair Fight, Inc. v. Catherine Engelbrecht, et al
as 24-10372
Plaintiff:
FAIR FIGHT, INC.
Defendant:
CATHERINE ENGELBRECHT, DEREK SOMERVILLE, MARK DAVIS and others
Not Yet Classified:
SERVICE
Williams v. O'Malley (CONSENT)
as 3:2024cv00023
Plaintiff:
Mark Williams
Defendant:
Martin J. O'Malley
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 405 Review of HHS Decision (DIWC)
Delgado v. Hughes et al
as 4:2024cv04008
Plaintiff:
David Delgado
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Mark Williams, Jason Garza and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Kelly v. Pima County Sheriff's Department et al
as 4:2024cv00001
Plaintiff:
Mark William Kelly
Defendant:
Pima County Sheriff's Department, Gina M Lumia, Guy Marchal and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Cappello v. Cisneros, et al.
as 23-3988
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK WILLIAM CAPPELLO
Respondent / Appellee:
TERESA CISNEROS and BRIAN D. PHILLIPS, Warden
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
