Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Tariri v. Massachusetts State Lottery Commission et al
as 1:2026cv13181
Plaintiff:
Benjamin Tariri
Defendant:
Massachusetts State Lottery Commission, Mark William Bracken, John Sweeney and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
United States v. Williams
as 26-5093
Plaintiff:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant:
MARK WILLIAMS, AKA Mark Anthony Williams
Bankston v. Williams
as 1:2026cv01281
Petitioner:
Johnnie Bankston
Respondent:
Mark Williams
Unknown:
Habeas Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Mays v. Hughes et al
as 4:2026cv04172
Plaintiff:
Kenneth Mays
Defendant:
Latoya Hughes, Mark Williams, Paula Baker and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Polinski v. Eannace et al
as 6:2026cv00732
Plaintiff:
Peter J. Polinski
Defendant:
Ralph Eannace, Scott D. McNamara, Donna Lynskey and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
Serra v. Town of East Longmeadow et al
as 3:2026cv30058
Plaintiff:
Alex Serra
Defendant:
Town of East Longmeadow, Mark Williams, Chief, Michael Ingalls, Sergeant and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights
Timmons v. Wexford Health Sources Inc et al
as 4:2026cv04077
Plaintiff:
Tracy Timmons
Defendant:
Wexford Health Sources Inc, Arthur Funk, Kasey Kramer and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Williams v. Bryant, et al
as 3:2026cv00466
Plaintiff:
Mark Williams
Defendant:
Correctional Officer Bryant and Correctional Officer V Montague
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. CANSLER et al
as 4:2026cv00107
Plaintiff:
MARK WILLIAMS
Defendant:
M CANSLER, RICKY D DIXON and A SPANOS
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
WILLIAMS v. BRYANT et al
as 4:2026cv00071
Plaintiff:
MARK WILLIAMS
Defendant:
BRYANT and V MONTAGUE
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
