Cases 1 - 10 of 85
Uhuru v. Bonnifield, et al.
as 24-775
Plaintiff:
KOHEN DIALLO E. UHURU
Defendant:
JIM BONNIFIELD, Community Resource Manager, individual and official capacity, JOSIE GASTELO, Warden, individual and official capacity, H. WARREN ALDERSON, and Predecessor, Protestant Chaplain, individual and official capacity and others
Cappello v. Cisneros, et al.
as 23-3988
Petitioner / Appellant:
MARK WILLIAM CAPPELLO
Respondent / Appellee:
TERESA CISNEROS and BRIAN D. PHILLIPS, Warden
Hutchins v. Michigan Department of Treasury
as 2:2023cv11549
Plaintiff:
Mark William Hutchins
Defendant:
Michigan Department of Treasury
Horses of Cumberland Island et al v. Haaland et al
as 1:2023cv01592
Plaintiff:
Horses of Cumberland Island, The Georgia Equine Rescue League, Ltd, The Georgia Horse Council, Inc and others
Defendant:
Hon. Deb Haaland, Mark Foust, Gary Ingram and others
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 551 Administrative Procedure Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2023cv00347
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Williams & Cochrane, LLP v. Sharon Rosette, et al
as 23-55166
Plaintiff / Appellant:
WILLIAMS & COCHRANE, LLP
Defendant / Appellee:
SHARON ROSETTE, ROSETTE & ASSOCIATES, PC and ROSETTE, LLP
Defendant:
QUECHAN TRIBE OF THE FORT YUMA INDIAN RESERVATION, ROBERT ROSETTE, RICHARD ARMSTRONG and others
Lane v. Department of Justice
as 23-206
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Mark William Lane
Defendant / Appellee:
United States Department of Justice, Components Federal Bureau of Investigation, Federal Bureau of Investigation, Office of Professional Responsibility and others
USA v. Mark Sain
as 22-6131
Plaintiff / Appellee:
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
Defendant / Appellant:
MARK WILLIAM SAIN
Townsend v. EPA
as 23-1143
Petitioner:
MARK WILLIAM TOWNSEND
Respondent:
ENVIRONMENTAL PROTECTION AGENCY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
