(PS) Harvey v. Nevada et al
| Daniel Thomas Harvey |
| Bernadette Smith, Terri Rosier, Matthew Ence, Jake Herminghaus, Richard Cornell, Thomas Gregory, California, Kevin Walsh, Kay Ellen Armstrong, Shannon Laney, Lori London, James Halsey, Nevada, Charles Duke, Andrew Eissinger, City of South Lake Tahoe and Douglas County, Nevada |
| 2:2019cv01123 |
| June 19, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Civil Rights: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 18, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by Courtroom Deputy J. Streeter for Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/16/2019: The Court is in receipt of Defendant Cornell's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. #8 ). The motion is noticed for hearing on 9/19/2019, which is not an available law and motion date. Defendant Cornell is directed to re-notice the Motion to Dismiss for one of the following available dates: 9/18/2019, 10/2/2019 or 10/9/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. Accordingly, the hearing date of 9/19/2019 is VACATED. (Streeter, J) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: 9 Minute Order served on Richard Cornell, Matthew Ence, Daniel Thomas Harvey. (Streeter, J) |
| Filing 8 MOTION to DISMISS by Richard Cornell. Motion Hearing set for 9/19/2019, at 10:00 AM, in Courtroom 24 (CKD), before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. (Attachments: #1 Notice)(York, M) |
| Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by Courtroom Deputy J. Streeter for Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 8/15/2019: The court is in receipt of Defendant Ence's Motion to Dismiss (ECF No. #6 . The motion, as filed, is defective. Defendant Ence is directed to comply with Local Rules 230(b) and notice the motion before the assigned Magistrate Judge. (Streeter, J) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: 7 Minute Order served on Matthew Ence and Daniel Thomas Harvey. (Streeter, J) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to DISMISS by Matthew Ence. (York, M) |
| Filing 5 CONSENT to JURISDICTION of US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by Matthew Ence. (York, M) |
| Filing 4 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *City of South Lake Tahoe, Douglas County, Nevada* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Daniel Thomas Harvey* *3508 Fawn Way* *South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150*. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 11/20/2019 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 24 (CKD) before Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Huang, H) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Kay Ellen Armstrong, California, Richard Cornell, Charles Duke, Andrew Eissinger, Matthew Ence, Thomas Gregory, James Halsey, Jake Herminghaus, Shannon Laney, Lori London, Nevada, Terri Rosier, Bernadette Smith, Kevin Walsh* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Daniel Thomas Harvey* *3508 Fawn Way* *South Lake Tahoe, CA 96150*. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against all Defendants by Daniel Thomas Harvey. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Huang, H) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Summons served on Daniel Thomas Harvey. (Huang, H) |
| RECEIPT number #CAE200098969 $400.00 fbo Daniel Thomas Harvey by Daniel Thomas Harvey on 6/19/2019. (Huang, H) |
| SERVICE OVER COUNTER: #2 Summons, #3 Civil New Case Documents for TLN served on Daniel Thomas Harvey. (Huang, H) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
