Cases 1 - 10 of 10
Daniel Harvey v. State of Nevada, et al
as 19-16625
Respondent / Appellee:
AARON DARNELL FORD and STATE OF NEVADA
Petitioner / Appellant:
DANIEL THOMAS HARVEY
(PS) Harvey v. Nevada et al
as 2:2019cv01123
Defendant:
Bernadette Smith, Terri Rosier, Matthew Ence and others
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Harvey
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey v. Ford
as 3:2019cv00312
Respondent:
Aaron Darnell Ford
Petitioner:
Daniel Thomas Harvey
Defendant:
State of Nevada
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Daniel Harvey v. City of South Lake Tahoe, et al
as 13-17225
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL THOMAS HARVEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, EL DORADO COUNTY, CA, ANDREW EISSINGER and others
Daniel Harvey v. City of South Lake Tahoe, et al
as 12-16764
Plaintiff - Appellant:
DANIEL THOMAS HARVEY
Defendant - Appellee:
CITY OF SOUTH LAKE TAHOE, EL DORADO COUNTY, CA, ANDREW EISSINGER and others
Harvey v. City of South Lake Tahoe et al
as 2:2012cv00526
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Harvey
Defendant:
City of South Lake Tahoe , Douglas County , Robert K. Priscaro and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Daniel Harvey v. George Chanos, et al
as 10-16499
Petitioner - Appellant:
DANIEL THOMAS HARVEY
Respondent - Appellee:
GEORGE J. CHANOS, Attorney General State of Nevada and KEVIN YOUNG, Division of Parole and Probation, CC, NV
Harvey v. City of South Lake Tahoe et al
as 2:2010cv01653
Plaintiff:
Daniel Thomas Harvey
Defendant:
City of South Lake Tahoe, El Dorado County, CA, Andrew Eissinger and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Harvey v. Chanos et al
as 3:2007cv00114
Petitioner:
Daniel Thomas Harvey
Respondent:
George J. Chanos and Kevin Young
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Harvey v. Chanos et al
as 3:2007cv00113
Petitioner:
Daniel Thomas Harvey
Respondent:
Kevin Young
Defendant:
Kristine L. Brown and Nevada Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
