(PC) Johnson v. Neuschmid et al
| LaCedric William Johnson |
| Martinez, Robert Neuschmid and A. Muhammad |
| 2:2019cv01598 |
| August 17, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| William B Shubb |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on April 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY) pursuant to Decline of Jurisdiction of US Magistrate Judge, this case has been assigned to Senior Judge William B. Shubb and Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. The new case number is: 2:19-cv-01598 WBS CKD (PC). (Becknal, R) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: 5 Clerk's Notice served on LaCedric William Johnson. (Becknal, R) |
| Filing 4 DECLINE to PROCEED BEFORE US MAGISTRATE JUDGE by LaCedric William Johnson. (Becknal, R) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *8/17/2019*; Consent or Decline due by 9/23/2019 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Zignago, K.) |
| SERVICE BY EMAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on LaCedric William Johnson. (Zignago, K.) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by LaCedric William Johnson. (Zignago, K.) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against all Defendants by LaCedric William Johnson. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Zignago, K.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.