Cases 1 - 10 of 100
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv00365
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus
Nazir v. U.S. Custom and Border Protection
as 1:2026cv04201
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Amir Nazir
Defendant:
U.S. Custom and Border Protection
Cause Of Action: 05 U.S.C. § 0552 Freedom of Information Act
The Resource Group International Limited v. Chishti
as 26-2014
Petitioner:
THE RESOURCE GROUP INTERNATIONAL LIMITED
Respondent:
SARAH POBERESKIN
Defendant:
MUHAMMAD ZIAULLAH KHAN CHISHTI
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 1:2026cv02878
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Immigration: Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Sonesta RL Hotels Franchising Inc. v. Pak Hospitality LLC et al
as 1:2026cv13366
Plaintiff:
Sonesta RL Hotels Franchising Inc.
Defendant:
Pak Hospitality LLC and Muhammad Zubair Khan
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332 Diversity-Breach of Contract
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2026cv00703
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1681 Fair Credit Reporting Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2026cv05787
Petitioner:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Respondent:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (federa
DirecTV, LLC v. Majeed et al
as 1:2026cv02178
Plaintiff:
DIRECTV, LLC
Defendant:
ABDUL MAJEED, DTV TECHNOLOGY, INC., DTV, INC. and others
Cause Of Action: 15 U.S.C. § 1125 Lanham Act
Farooq v. American Security Insurance Company
as 4:2026cv00867
Plaintiff:
Muhammad Omar Farooq
Defendant:
American Security Insurance Company
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1331 Fed. Question: Insurance Contract
Haseeb v. Blanche
as 26-60562
Petitioner:
Muhammad Haseeb
Respondent:
Todd Wallace Blanche, Acting U.S. Attorney General
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
