Burns v. Progressive Casualty Ins. Co.
Paul Burns |
Progressive Casualty Insurance Company |
2:2019cv02336 |
November 18, 2019 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Dennis M Cota |
Kimberly J Mueller |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1332 |
Both |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on March 18, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
MINUTE ORDER: Due to a conflict in the court's schedule, the. Initial Scheduling Conference is moved to 3/25/2020 at 10:00 AM in Redding (DMC) before Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota. (Pine, C) |
Filing 8 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Pine for Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota setting the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference for 3/18/2020 at 10:00 a.m. at 2986 Bechelli Lane, Redding, California before Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota. (Pine, C) |
Filing 7 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy C. Schultz for District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller ORDERING this matter REFERRED to Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota for pretrial scheduling. Accordingly, the Status (Pretrial Scheduling) Conference set for 4/2/2020 before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller is VACATED and will be reset by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota. (Text Only Entry) (Schultz, C) |
Filing 6 CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Johns, Douglas) |
Filing 5 CERTIFICATE of SERVICE by Progressive Casualty Insurance Company re #3 Corporate Disclosure Statement, #4 Civil New Case Documents for KJM, #2 Notice of Interested Parties, #1 Notice of Removal,. (Johns, Douglas) |
Filing 4 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 4/2/2020 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Tupolo, A) |
Filing 3 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendant Progressive Casualty Insurance Company. (Johns, Douglas) |
Filing 2 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Progressive Casualty Insurance Company. (Johns, Douglas) |
Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Tehama County Superior Court of California, case number 19CI000267 by Progressive Casualty Insurance Company. (Filing fee $ 400, receipt number 0972-8574693) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit Exhibit B, #3 Civil Cover Sheet, #4 Demand for Jury)(Johns, Douglas) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Search for this case: Burns v. Progressive Casualty Ins. Co. | |
---|---|
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Plaintiff: Paul Burns | |
Represented By: | Collin M. Bogener |
Represented By: | Aaron Wayne Moore |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Defendant: Progressive Casualty Insurance Company | |
Represented By: | Douglas Earl Johns |
Search News | [ Google News | Marketwatch | Wall Street Journal | Financial Times | New York Times ] |
Search Finance | [ Google Finance | Yahoo Finance | Hoovers | SEC Edgar Filings ] |
Search Web | [ Unicourt | Justia Dockets | Legal Web | Google | Bing | Yahoo | Ask ] |
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.