(PC) Perryman v. Director, CDCR et al
| David Perryman |
| Supervisor, Director, CDCR, K. Lynch and Gavin Newsom |
| 2:2019cv02480 |
| December 11, 2019 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Deborah Barnes |
| John A Mendez |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 9 MOTION for 60-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME and MOTION for Writing Supplies by David Perryman. (Attachments: #1 Notice re Mail Confirmation)(Huang, H) |
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 2/5/2020 GRANTING #7 Motion for Extension of Time; GRANTING Plaintiff 60 days from the date of this order in which to file his objections; and ORDERING Office of the CA Attorney General to contact the CSP-Sac Litigation Coordinator to determine what, if any, access plaintiff currently has to pen fillers or other writing implements and file and serve a statement reflecting the findings of such inquiry, including all appropriate declarations, within 15 days after the filing date of this order. (cc: Monica Anderson, Supervising Deputy Attorney General) (Henshaw, R)
|
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order served on David Perryman. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 7 MOTION for 60-DAY EXTENSION OF TIME and MOTION for Writing Supplies by David Perryman. (Huang, H) Modified on 2/4/2020 (Plummer, M). |
|
Filing 6
ORDER and FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes on 1/20/2020 ORDERING Clerk to randomly assign a district judge to this case; DENYING Request in #1 Complaint for Appointment of Counsel; and RECOMMENDING this action be dismissed for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted. Assigned and referred to Judge John A. Mendez. Objections due within 14 days after being served with these findings and recommendations. (Henshaw, R)
|
| Filing 5 CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge John A. Mendez and Magistrate Judge Deborah Barnes. The new case number is: 2:19-cv-2480 JAM DB (PC). (Henshaw, R) |
| SERVICE BY MAIL: #6 Order and Findings and Recommendations served on David Perryman. (Henshaw, R) |
| Filing 4 PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by David Perryman. (York, M) |
| CLERKS NOTICE (text only): The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for David Perryman, CDCR# AB-1204 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Yin, K) |
| Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *12/11/2019*; Consent or Decline due by 1/16/2020 (Attachments: #1 Order re Consent, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Tupolo, A) |
| SERVICE BY EMAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on David Perryman. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by David Perryman. (Tupolo, A) |
| Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against All Defendants by David Perryman. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Tupolo, A) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
