(PS) Schmitz et al v. Asman et al
Dianne Mallia and Thomas Schmitz |
Sujatha Ramkumar, Rainbow Brockenborough, Adam Asman, T. Campbell, Erik Bradley, Scott A. Heatley, Joe A. Lizarraga, Violka Waine, Christopher Smith, Marianna Kate Ashe, Michael Golding, Laura Ceballos, David Brunkhorst, Jevon Johnson, Alex Andaluz, Robert Johnson, Jack Aamot, Eric Branman, Michael Smith, James Burns, Rebecca Robinson, Ketherine Tebrock, Connie Gibson, Stephen Denigris, Ralph Diaz, Angela Ponciano, David Leidner, Robert Rudas, Diana Toche, Jacob Adams, Brittany Brizendine, John Rekart, Scott Kernan, Kevin Kuich and California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation |
2:2020cv00195 |
January 27, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Carolyn K Delaney |
John A Mendez |
Civil Rights: Other |
42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act |
Plaintiff |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on May 1, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.