(PC) Lamon v. Mey et al
| Barry Louis Lamon |
| A.E. Spearman, Grether, Roderick, Smith and S. Mey |
| 2:2020cv01474 |
| July 22, 2020 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. § 1983 |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 11, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 13
MOTION for PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION by Barry Louis Lamon. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing 12
FIRST AMENDED PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against all Defendants by Barry Louis Lamon. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing 11
OBJECTIONS by Plaintiff Barry Louis Lamon to #7 Order. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing 10
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Barry Louis Lamon. (Coll, A) Modified on 8/10/2020 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing 9
DOCUMENT SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: #2 Motion to Proceed IFP served on CDCR. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/3/2020 DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of Barry Louis Lamon. The custodial agency shall collect an initial partial filing fee and monthly payments in accordance with this order until the filing fee of $350 is paid in full. (cc: CDCR and Financial Department) (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 8/3/2020 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP; ORDERING Plaintiff may file an amended complaint within 30 days of service of this order to attempt to cure the pleading defects as discussed in this order; and ORDERING if Plaintiff opts to proceed on his original complaint as to defendants Mey, Spearman, Grether, Roderick and Smith, he is to return the attached notice within 30 days of service of this order. Plaintiff to pay the statutory filing fee of $350.00. All fees to be collected and paid in accordance with this court's order to the CDCR filed concurrently herewith. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order Directing Prisoner Payment and #7 Order served on Barry Louis Lamon. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing 5
PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Barry Louis Lamon. (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing 4
CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Barry Louis Lamon, CDC E-08345 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 8/27/2020. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Zignago, K.)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on Barry Louis Lamon. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Barry Louis Lamon. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against all Defendants by Barry Louis Lamon. (Zignago, K.)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
