(PC) Roberts v. Monterey County Jail
David Roberts and David Nathaniel Roberts |
Monterey County Jail, Mendez, Arroyo, Tondee, Murillo, Argueta and Jarrequin |
2:2020cv01751 |
August 31, 2020 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Edmund F Brennan |
Jeremy D Peterson |
Prisoner: Civil Rights |
42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on November 5, 2020. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 4 ORDER by Chief Judge Kimberly J. Mueller: The Court having considered the equitable division and efficient and economical determination of court business, hereby reassigns this case from Magistrate Judge *Edmund F. Brennan* to *Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson* for all further proceedings. As of October 1, 2020, Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson is reassigned to the Sacramento Division of the Eastern District of California. (Donati, J) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #4 Order Reassigning Magistrate Judge, served on David Nathaniel Roberts. (Donati, J) |
Filing 3 PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 10/5/2020. (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Zignago, K.) |
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents served on David Roberts. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 2 MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by David Roberts. (Zignago, K.) |
Filing 1 PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Monterey County Jail by David Roberts. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet) (Zignago, K.) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.