Cases 1 - 10 of 1,305
Salvador Murillo v. Muscatine County Jail
as 24-1936
Plaintiff:
Salvador Manjarrez Murillo
Defendant:
Muscatine County Jail
Vasquez v. Fast Track Leasing LLC et al
as 2:2024cv00939
Plaintiff:
Christian Murillo Vasquez
Defendant:
Fast Track Leasing LLC and Deninson Dugarte Rivas
Cause Of Action: 49 U.S.C. § 32710 Federal Odometer Act
Murillo v. Chenega Global Services, LLC
as 3:2024cv00133
Plaintiff:
Angelica Murillo
Defendant:
Chenega Global Services, LLC
Cause Of Action: 41 U.S.C. § 1463 Public Contracts: Unlawful Employment Prac
Murillo-Prijic v. United States of America
as 0:2024cv60484
Petitioner:
Arturo Carlos Murillo-Prijic
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
MURILLO-PRIJIC v. United States of America
as 1:2024cv21150
Petitioner:
ARTURO CARLOS MURILLO-PRIJIC
Respondent:
United States of America
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2255 Motion to Vacate Sentence
Murillo v. Covello et al
as 1:2024cv01787
Plaintiff:
Cixto Cruz Murillo
Defendant:
Warden Patrick Covello, Mr. Canelo, Stephanie Cornell and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Keene, et al. v. City and County of San Francisco, et al.
as 24-1574
Plaintiff:
SELINA KEENE, MARK MCCLURE, MELODY FOUNTILA and others
Defendant:
CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO, LONDON BREED, CAROL ISEN and others
Murillo v. The Prudential Insurance Company of America
as 1:2024cv20981
Plaintiff:
Jose Murillo
Defendant:
The Prudential Insurance Company of America
Cause Of Action: 29 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.: Employee Retirement
Castellanos-Murillo, et al. v. Garland
as 24-1386
Petitioner:
ELVIN NAHUM CASTELLANOS-MURILLO and LEANDRO CASTELLANOS-FUENTES
Respondent:
MERRICK B. GARLAND, ATTORNEY GENERAL
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 3:2024cv01291
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 08 U.S.C. § 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
