(PC)Rouser v. Lynch et al
| William Rouser |
| Jeff Lynch, A. Chen, C. Bennamon, D. Khripach, J. Charon, Khoa Phram, Lori W. Austin, Smith and Fred Mathew |
| 2:2021cv00233 |
| February 5, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Jeremy D Peterson |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 6, 2024. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 10
DOCUMENT(S) SERVED ELECTRONICALLY: IFP application #2 served on Director of CDC. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER DIRECTING MONTHLY PAYMENTS be made from Prison Account of William Rouser signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 03/31/21. CDC shall collect payments from plaintiff's account and forward to the clerk until the $350.00 filing fee is paid in full. Clerk to serve this order and a copy of plaintiff's IFP on the Director of CDC. Clerk to also serve Financial with a copy of this order. (cc: CDC Director and Financial)(Plummer, M)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order Directing Prisoner Payment, served on William Rouser. (Plummer, M)
|
|
RE-SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order, Set/Reset Deadlines and Hearings, Set/Clear Flags, Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on William Rouser to updated address. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing 7
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Jeremy D. Peterson on 3/29/2021 GRANTING #2 Motion to Proceed IFP and DISMISSING #1 Complaint with leave to amend within 30 days from the date of service of this order. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #7 Order served on William Rouser. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 8
NOTICE of CHANGE of ADDRESS to Mule Creek State Prison, P.O. Box 409640, Ione, CA 95640 by William Rouser. (Kastilahn, A)
|
|
Filing 6
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing 5
PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by William Rouser (Kaminski, H)
|
|
Filing 4
CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for William Rouser, CDC C-10659 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (TEXT ONLY) (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; E-Filing Notice issued re complaint filed *2/5/2021*; Consent or Decline due by 3/15/2021 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter, #2 E-Filing Notice) (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on William Rouser. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by William Rouser. (Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Lori W. Austin, C. Bennamon, J. Charon, A Chen, D. Khripach, Jeff Lynch, Fred Mathew, Khoa Phram, Smith by William Rouser. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Mena-Sanchez, L)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
