Redding Rancheria v. State of CA, et al
| Redding Rancheria |
| State of California and Gavin Newsom |
| 2:2021cv00579 |
| March 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dennis M Cota |
| Anthony W Ishii |
| Sheila K Oberto |
| William B Shubb |
| Other Statutory Actions |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 1331 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on December 19, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 15
STIPULATION and ORDER REGARDING SERVICE OF SUMMONS AND COMPLAINT, DATE BY WHICH ANSWER OR OTHER RESPONSIVE PLEADING IS DUE. Order signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/17/2021. (Kusamura, W)
|
| Filing 14 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Extension of Time to File Response to #1 Complaint by Gavin Newsom, State of California. Attorney Fischer, Noel A. added. (Fischer, Noel) Modified on 5/17/2021 (Coll, A). |
|
Filing 13
MINUTE ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto on 5/5/2021: (Text Only Entry) In view of the Court's order of relation, the Court hereby VACATES the Initial Scheduling Conference set for July 19, 2021 at 1:30 PM before Senior District Judge William B. Shubb, and RESETS the Initial Scheduling Conference to July 8, 2021 at 9:45 AM before Magistrate Judge Sheila K. Oberto. The parties SHALL file their joint scheduling report 7 days prior to the conference. (Kusamura, W)
|
|
Filing 12
ORDER RELATING AND REASSIGNING CASE; new case number 2:21-cv-00579 AWI-SKO, signed by District Judge Anthony W. Ishii on 05/3/2021. (Martin-Gill, S)
|
| Filing 11 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: upon State of California on 4/27/2021 (Crowell, Scott) Modified on 5/4/2021 (Reader, L). |
| Filing 10 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Redding Rancheria served on 4/27/2021, answer due 5/18/2021. (Crowell, Scott) |
| Filing 9 PROPOSED ORDER re Relating Cases and Reassignment re #4 Notice of Related Case(s) by Redding Rancheria. (Crowell, Scott) |
|
Filing 8
PRO HAC VICE ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 3/30/2021 GRANTING #5 Application for Pro Hac Vice. Added attorney Scott David Crowell, PHV for Redding Rancheria. (Coll, A)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE OF INTERESTED PARTIES by Redding Rancheria. (Hollowell, Michael) |
| Filing 6 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Plaintiff Redding Rancheria. (Hollowell, Michael) |
| Filing 5 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Redding Rancheria for attorney Scott D. Crowell to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Filing fee $ 225, receipt number 0972-9508688) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit Scott Crowell Certificate of Good Standing)(Hollowell, Michael) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of RELATED CASE(S) 1:19-cv-00024-AWI-SKO, 1:20-cv-01147-AWI-SKO, 1:20-cv-01318-AWI-SKO, 1:20-cv-01539-AWI-SKO, 2:20-cv-01585-AWI-SKO, 2:20-cv-01630-AWI-SKO, 2:20-cv-01918-AWI-SKO by Redding Rancheria. (Hollowell, Michael) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 7/19/2021 at 01:30 PM in Courtroom 5 (WBS) before Senior Judge William B. Shubb. (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Gavin Newsom, State of California* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Michael J. Hollowell* *Redding Rancheria* *2000 Redding Rancheria Road* *Redding, CA 96001*. (Benson, A.) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Gavin Newsom, State of California by Redding Rancheria Indian Tribe. Attorney Hollowell, Michael J. added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number 0972-9508258) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Hollowell, Michael) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
