(HC) James v. People of the State of California
| Ronald Eugene James |
| The People of the State of California and People of the State of California |
| 2:2021cv01005 |
| June 7, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dennis M Cota |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 13, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 14
FIRST AMENDED PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS by Ronald Eugene James. (MAINTAINED ON PAPER) (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing 13
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 7/29/21 RECOMMENDING that this action be dismissed without prejudice, for lack of prosecution and failure to comply with court rules and orders. Referred to Judge Troy L. Nunley. Objections due within 14 days.(Plummer, M)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #13 Findings and Recommendations (Motion), served on Ronald Eugene James. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing 12
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against People of the State of California by Ronald Eugene James. (Attachments: #1 Supplement)(Becknal, R)
|
|
Filing 11
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 7/23/2021 DISMISSING #1 Petition with leave to amend; GRANTING Petitioner 30 days of the date of this order to file a First Amended Petition on the form employed by this court; and ORDERING Clerk to send Petitioner the Court's form habeas corpus application. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 10
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 7/23/2021 DENYING without prejudice #5 Request for Issuance of Subpoena Form. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 9
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 7/23/2021 DENYING without prejudice #4 Motion to Appoint Counsel. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #10 Order, #9 Order, #11 Order, and Court's form habeas corpus application served on Ronald Eugene James. (Henshaw, R)
|
|
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 06/30/21 GRANTING #7 Motion to Proceed IFP. (Plummer, M)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Order on Motion to Proceed in forma pauperis served on Ronald Eugene James. (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing 7
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Ronald Eugene James. (Tupolo, A) Modified on 6/28/2021 (Plummer, M).
|
|
Filing 6
CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to District Judge Troy L. Nunley and Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota. The new case number is: 2:21-cv-1005-TLN-DMC. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: 6 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Ronald Eugene James. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing 5
MOTION for ISSUANCE of subpoena by Ronald Eugene James. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing 4
MOTION to APPOINT COUNSEL by Ronald Eugene James. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing 3
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Zignago, K.)
|
|
Filing 2
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 7/12/2021 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Tupolo, A)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Ronald Eugene James. (Tupolo, A)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against The People of the State of California by Ronald Eugene James.(Tupolo, A)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
