Cases 1 - 9 of 9
(PC) James v. Sacramento County Sheriff Dept., et al
as 2:2023cv00853
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Defendant:
Sacramento County Sheriff Department, Richardson, - Ahmad and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC)James v. Bonta

as 2:2023cv00530
Petitioner:
Ronald Eugene James
Respondent:
Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) James v State of CA Attorney General et al

as 2:2023cv00037
Petitioner:
Ronald Eugene James
Respondent:
State of California Attorney General
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(PC) James v. County of Sacramento

as 2:2022cv02193
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Defendant:
County of Sacramento
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) James v. The State of California et al

as 2:2022cv02190
Petitioner:
Ronald Eugene James
Respondent:
The State of California and Rob Bonta
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
(HC) James v. People of the State of California

as 2:2021cv01005
Petitioner:
Ronald Eugene James
Respondent:
The People of the State of California and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC) James v. People of the State of California

as 2:2021cv00987
Petitioner:
Ronald Eugene James
Respondent:
The People of the State of California and People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(PC) James v. State of California et al

as 2:2021cv00713
Defendant:
The City of Sacramento Police Department, Sacramento County, The State of California and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) James v. Elk Grove Police Department

as 2:2021cv00683
Defendant:
Elk Grove Police Department
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.