Cases 1 - 10 of 24
(PC) James v. Ma
as 2:2024cv02193
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Defendant:
Ma
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) James v. Mattel et al
as 2:2024cv01954
Defendant:
Carl Tenbrink, Mattel, Stacey Renee James and others
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
James v. Sacramento County Sheriff
as 24-3961
Petitioner:
RONALD EUGENE JAMES
Respondent:
SACRAMENTO COUNTY SHERIFF
(PC) James v. Fadika
as 2:2024cv01773
Defendant:
Nicolofar Fadika
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) James v. Michelle et al
as 2:2024cv01770
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Defendant:
Michelle and Doctor
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(PC) James v. Sacramento County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01585
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Defendant:
Sacramento County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
(HC) James v. Sacramento County Superior Court
as 2:2024cv01511
Petitioner:
Ronald Eugene James
Respondent:
Sacramento County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254 Petition for Writ of Habeas Corpus (State)
James v. United States District Court for the Eastern District of California, Sacramento
as 24-3222
Petitioner:
RONALD EUGENE JAMES
Respondent:
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA, SACRAMENTO
Interested Party:
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SAUCEDO, Deputy, LYNETTE, Nurse and others
James v. County of Sacramento, et al.
as 24-2837
Plaintiff:
RONALD EUGENE JAMES
Defendant:
COUNTY OF SACRAMENTO, SAUCEDO, Deputy, LYNETTE, Nurse and others
Ronald Eugene James v. Mattel et al
as 2:2024cv03184
Plaintiff:
Ronald Eugene James
Defendant:
Mattel, Stacey Renee Carson James, Carl Tenbrink and others
Cause Of Action: 17 U.S.C. § 101 Copyright Infringement
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
