(HC) Garrett v. State of California et al
| State of California, Amador County Jail and Amador County Superior Court |
| Cameo Loree Garrett |
| 2:2021cv01781 |
| September 29, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dennis M Cota |
| Habeas Corpus (General) |
| 28 U.S.C. ยง 2254 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on January 10, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
MAIL RETURNED as Undeliverable, RTS, Not in Custody: #3 Order sent to Cameo Loree Garrett. Notice of Change of Address due by 1/6/2022. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing 3
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Dennis M. Cota on 10/13/2021 DIRECTING Plaintiff to file a Motion for IFP or pay the filing fee within 30 days from the date of this order. The Clerk of the Court is directed to send Petitioner a new IFP Form. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Order and IFP Form served on Cameo Loree Garrett. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing 2
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 11/4/2021 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #2 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Cameo Loree Garrett. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing 1
PETITION for WRIT of HABEAS CORPUS against Amador County Jail, Amador County Superior Court, State of California by Cameo Loree Garrett. (Rodriguez, E)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
