Cases 1 - 10 of 16
Garrett v. Archdiocese of Tacoma et al
as 3:2023cv05088
Plaintiff:
Cameo Loree Garrett
Defendant:
Archdiocese of Tacoma, Archdiocese of Seattle, Archdiocese of Spokane and others
Cause Of Action: 18 U.S.C. § 1961 Racketeering (RICO) Act
Garrett v. Garrett
as 3:2023cv05089
Plaintiff:
Cameo Loree Garrett
Defendant:
Dicksie-Dael Garrett
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Civil Rights Act
(HC) Garrett v. Amador County Conservator et al
as 2:2021cv01888
Petitioner:
Cameo Loree Garrett
Respondent:
Amador County Conservator, State of California, Amador County and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
(HC)Garrett v. State of California et al
as 2:2021cv01838
Petitioner:
Cameo Loree Garrett
Respondent:
State of California and Amador County
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(PC)Garrett v. State of California et al
as 2:2021cv01825
Plaintiff:
Cameo Loree Garrett
Defendant:
State of California, Amador County Public Defenders Office, Amador County Jail and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(HC) Garrett v. State of California et al
as 2:2021cv01781
Petitioner:
Cameo Loree Garrett
Defendant:
State of California, Amador County Jail and Amador County Superior Court
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 2254
Cameo Garrett v. State of California, et al
as 21-71281
Petitioner:
CAMEO LOREE GARRETT
Respondent:
STATE OF CALIFORNIA and AMADOR COUNTY
(PC)Garrett v. Harman et al
as 2:2021cv01658
Plaintiff:
Cameo L. Garrett and Cameo Loree Garrett
Defendant:
Dawn Harman, State of California, Amador County and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Garrett v. Day et al
as 2:2021cv01627
Plaintiff:
Cameo Garrett and Cameo Loree Garrett
Defendant:
Renee C. Day and Randall Shrout
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
(PC) Garrett v. People of the State of California
as 2:2021cv01628
Plaintiff:
Cameo L. Garrett and Cameo Loree Garrett
Defendant:
People of the State of California
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
