(PC) Bradford v. Moseley et al
| Raymond Alford Bradford |
| Howard E. Moseley, S. Gates, Kathleen Allison, Gavin Newsom, City, County of Sacramento and State of California |
| 2:2021cv02374 |
| December 20, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Carolyn K Delaney |
| William B Shubb |
| Prisoner: Civil Rights |
| 42 U.S.C. ยง 1983 |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on March 14, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
Filing 9
ORDER signed by Senior Judge William B. Shubb on 02/14/2022 ADOPTING #8 Findings and Recommendations in full; DENYING #2 Motion to Proceed In Forma Pauperis. Plaintiff is GRANTED 14 days from the date this Order in which to pay the $402 filing fee for this action. Failure to pay the filing fee within the time permitted will result in the dismissal of this action without prejudice. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #9 Order Adopting Findings and Recommendations served on Raymond Alford Bradford. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing 8
FINDINGS and RECOMMENDATIONS signed by Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney on 1/14/2022 RECOMMENDING plaintiff's #2 motion for leave to proceed ifp be denied; plaintiff be granted 14 days within which to pay the $402.00 filing fee for this action. Failure to pay the filing fee within fourteen days will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed. Referred to Judge William B. Shubb; Objections to F&R due within 14 days. (Yin, K)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #8 Findings and Recommendations served on Raymond Alford Bradford. (Yin, K)
|
|
Filing 7
PRISONER TRUST FUND ACCOUNT STATEMENT by Raymond Alford Bradford. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing 6
CLERK'S NOTICE REASSIGNING CASE (TEXT ONLY). This case has been assigned to Senior Judge William B. Shubb and Magistrate Judge Carolyn K. Delaney. The new case number is: 2:21-cv-2374-WBS-CKD (PC). (Huang, H)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: 6 Clerk's Notice Reassigning Case served on Raymond Alford Bradford. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 5
CONSENT/DECLINE of U.S. Magistrate Judge Jurisdiction. Pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 73(b)(1), this document is restricted to attorneys and court staff only. Judges do not have access to view this document and will be informed of a party's response only if all parties have consented to the referral. (Huang, H)
|
|
Filing 4
CLERKS NOTICE: The Clerk of Court is in receipt of a Motion to Proceed in Forma Pauperis. The California Department of Corrections and Rehabilitation is DIRECTED to submit a Certified Prison Trust account statement for Raymond Alford Bradford, CDC H-16258 to the Clerks Office within 72 business hours of this notification. The Prison Trust Account statement must reflect the activity for the last six months. Please email the certified prison trust account statement in pdf format to FilingsSacramento@caed.uscourts.gov with the case number in the subject line as reflected on this notification. (TEXT ONLY) (Plummer, M)
|
|
Filing 3
PRISONER NEW CASE DOCUMENTS and ORDER RE CONSENT ISSUED; Consent or Decline due by 1/24/2022 (Attachments: #1 Litigant Letter) (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
SERVICE BY MAIL: #3 Prisoner New Case Documents for Magistrate Judge as Presider served on Raymond Alford Bradford. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing 2
MOTION to PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS by Raymond Alford Bradford. (Rodriguez, E)
|
|
Filing 1
PRISONER CIVIL RIGHTS COMPLAINT against Kathleen Allison, City, County of Sacramento, S. Gates, Howard E. Moseley, Gavin Newsom, State of California by Raymond Alford Bradford.(Rodriguez, E)
|
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
