Palmer et al v. Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation et al
| Christy Palmer, Vartan Piroumian, Edward Cox and Jean-Claude Franchitti |
| Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation and Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation |
| 2:2021mc00229 |
| September 15, 2021 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Troy L Nunley |
| Civil Rights: Jobs |
| None |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on October 29, 2021. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| OTHER COURT CASE NUMBER from Central District of California case number 2:21-mc-01088. (Gonzalez, R) |
Filing 8
ORDER signed by Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/25/2021 VACATING #6 the hearing on the Motion to Quash scheduled for 10/28/2021. CASE TRANSFERRED to Central District of California. DENIED as MOOT #7 Request to Seal, and the documents received by chambers will be returned to counsel. After transfer, the Clerk of the Court is directed to close this miscellaneous action, as the motion to quash is the only matter of substance herein. CASE CLOSED(Reader, L)
|
| Filing 7 NOTICE of Request to Seal Document(s) pursuant to L.R. 141 by Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation. (Attachments: #1 Proposed Order)(Smith, Katherine) |
| Filing 6 MOTION to QUASH Third-Party Subpoena by Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation. Motion Hearing set for 10/28/2021 at 10:00 AM in Courtroom 25 (KJN) before Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman. (Attachments: #1 Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Aliya McLendon Horne, #3 Declaration of Katherine V.A. Smith, #4 Exhibit A to Smith Decl., #5 Exhibit B to Smith Decl., #6 Exhibit C to Smith Decl., #7 Exhibit D to Smith Decl., #8 Proposed Order, #9 Proof of Service)(Smith, Katherine) |
| Filing 5 MINUTE ORDER issued by Courtroom Deputy for Magistrate Judge Kendall J. Newman on 10/1/2021: Pending before the court is defendants' motion to quash. (ECF No. #1 .) The motion is currently set for hearing on October 7, 2021 before the undersigned. Local Rule 251(b) establishes requirements for any party bringing a motion pursuant to Federal Rules of Civil Procedure 26 through 37, including the requirement that the parties meet and confer and file a joint discovery statement. Here, no joint discovery statement was filed, and there is no indication the parties have met and conferred over this dispute. Therefore, the motion to quash is DENIED WITHOUT PREJUDICE, and the hearing is VACATED. See Local Rule 251(a) ("The hearing may be dropped from the calendar without prejudice if the Joint Statement re Discovery Disagreement... is not filed at least seven (7) days before the scheduled hearing date."); see also, e.g., U.S. v. Molen, 2012 WL 5940383, at *1 (E.D. Cal. Nov. 27, 2012) (denying discovery motion without prejudice, subject to re-filing, where the moving party failed to comply with Local Rule 251). (TEXT ONLY ENTRY) (Waldrop, A) |
| Filing 4 NOTICE of Motion and Motion to Quash Third-Party Subpoena, Hearing Date October 7, 2021 by Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation re #1 Motion to Quash. (Smith, Katherine) |
| NEW MISCELLANEOUS CASE FILED Motion to Quash Third-Party Subpoena. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 3 NOTICE of RELATED CASE(S) 2:17-cv-06848-DMG-PLA by Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation. (Smith, Katherine) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendants Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation. (Smith, Katherine) |
| Filing 1 MOTION to QUASH Third-Party Subpoena by Cognizant Technology Solutions Corporation, Cognizant Technology Solutions U.S. Corporation. Attorney Smith, Katherine V.A. added. (Attachments: #1 Points and Authorities, #2 Declaration of Katherine V.A. Smith, #3 Exhibit A, #4 Exhibit B, #5 Exhibit C, #6 Exhibit D, #7 Declaration of Aliya Horne, #8 Proposed Order, #9 Civil Cover Sheet, #10 Proof of Service)(Smith, Katherine) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
