Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company v. Matejov et al
Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company |
James Matejov and Lawrence Davis |
2:2022cv00377 |
March 1, 2022 |
US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
Deborah Barnes |
Kimberly J Mueller |
Insurance |
28 U.S.C. ยง 1001 E.R.I.S.A. |
None |
Docket Report
This docket was last retrieved on July 13, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
Document Text |
---|
Filing 5 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to Lawrence Davis on 3/15/2022, Answer due 5/16/2022 (Spallina, Randi) |
Filing 4 WAIVER of SERVICE RETURNED EXECUTED: Waiver sent to James Matejov on 3/10/2022, Answer due 5/9/2022 (Spallina, Randi) |
Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; Initial Scheduling Conference set for 7/14/2022 at 02:30 PM in Courtroom 3 (KJM) before Chief District Judge Kimberly J. Mueller. (Attachments: #1 Standing Order, #2 Consent Form, #3 VDRP) (Reader, L) |
Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Lawrence Davis, James Matejov* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Randi Perry Spallina* *Bressler Amery & Ross, PC* *200 E. Las Olas Boulevard, Suite 1500* *Fort Lauderdale, FL 33301*. (Reader, L) |
Filing 1 COMPLAINT for Interpleader Relief against Lawrence Davis, James Matejov by Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company. Attorney Spallina, Randi Perry added. (Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10099073) (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Spallina, Randi) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.