Cases 1 - 10 of 68
Tammy Watkins v. Lawrence Davis, et al
as 23-13616
Plaintiff / Appellee:
TAMMY WATKINS
Defendant / Appellant:
LAWRENCE DAVIS and JOSHUA FAULKER
John Moses v. Reed Gusciora, et al
as 23-2302
Plaintiff / Appellant:
JOHN MOSES
Defendant / Appellee:
REED GUSCIORA, MAYOR OF CITY OF TRENTON, ANDREW BOBBIT, ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, PEDRO MEDINA, POLICE DIRECTOR and others
Defendant:
ANDREW BOBBIT, LAWRENCE DAVIS, REED GUSCIORA and others
VAUGHN v. DAVIS et al
as 1:2023cv00960
Plaintiff:
SCOTT M. VAUGHN, JR.
Defendant:
LAWRENCE DAVIS and AMBER NORROD
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983 Prisoner Civil Rights
Uber Technologies Incorporated v. Davis
as 2:2023cv00416
Plaintiff:
Uber Technologies Incorporated
Defendant:
Sir Lawrence Davis
Cause Of Action: 09 U.S.C. § 1 U.S. Arbitration Act
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 22-16802
Plaintiff / Appellant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant / Appellee:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 2:2022cv01510
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 2000 e Job Discrimination (Employment)
Plaintiff v. Defendant
as 4:2022cv01562
Plaintiff:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Defendant:
Plaintiff v. Defendant
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 451 Employment Discrimination
Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company v. Matejov et al
as 2:2022cv00377
Plaintiff:
Variable Annuity Life Insurance Company
Defendant:
James Matejov and Lawrence Davis
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1001 E.R.I.S.A.
Watkins v. Davis et al
as 1:2021cv04081
Plaintiff:
Tammy Watkins
Defendant:
Officer Lawrence Davis, Officer Joshua Faulker, Henry County, Georgia and others
Cause Of Action: 42 U.S.C. § 1983
Davis v. Sanofi, S.A. et al
as 9:2021cv81805
Plaintiff:
Lawrence Davis
Defendant:
Sanofi, S.A., Sanofi US Services, Inc., Sanofi-Aventis US LLC and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1332
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
