(PS) Elshall v. Biggs et al
| Mohammed Elshall |
| Michael Biggs, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Christopher Wray and Merrick Garland |
| 2:2022cv00944 |
| June 1, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Kimberly J Mueller |
| Kendall J Newman |
| Naturalization Application |
| 08 U.S.C. ยง 1329 Writ of Mandamus to Adjudicate Visa Petition |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on June 17, 2022. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 4 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Michael Biggs served on 6/9/2022; Merrick Garland served on 6/8/2022; Ur Mendoza Jaddou served on 6/8/2022; Alejandro Mayorkas served on 6/8/2022; Christopher Wray served on 6/13/2022. (Kaminski, H) |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form) (Huang, H) |
| Filing 2 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Michael Biggs, Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Christopher Wray* with answer to complaint due within *60* days. Attorney *Mohammed Elshall* *1886 Caversham Way* *Folsom, CA 95630*. (Huang, H) |
| Filing 1 COMPLAINT against Michael Biggs, Merrick Garland, Ur Mendoza Jaddou, Alejandro Mayorkas, Christopher Wray by Mohammed Elshall. (Attachments: #1 Civil Cover Sheet)(Huang, H) |
| RECEIPT number #CAE200121146 $402.00 fbo Mohammed Elshall by Mohammed Elshall on 6/1/2022. (Huang, H) |
| SERVICE BY OVER COUNTER: #2 Summons, #3 Civil New Case Documents for KJM, served on Mohammed Elshall. (Huang, H) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
