Hearden et al v. Windsor Redding Care Center LLC et al
| Nancy Hearden, Johanna Trenerry, Irene Kelley, Sally Kelley, Matthew Trenerry, Beverly Fuller, Anthony Trennery, Sharon McMaines, Janis Bodine, Dennis McMaines, Darlyn Dulaney, Karlene Wallace, Jeremiah Boeninger, Sandra Bryant, Tamara Dukes, Robert Rather, Larry Riggs, Robert Riggs, Sally Sorenson, Terrie Callaway, Robert Gutierres, Delores Gutierres, Caryl Endicott, Damon White, Carolyn Silva, Pamela Santos, Gary Mattos, Gordon Farmer, Scott Farmer, Charles Balding, Leonard Balding, Ronald Frisbey and William Trenerry |
| Windsor Redding Care Center LLC, Shlomo Rechnitz, Brius Management Co., Brius, LLC, Lee Samson and S&F Management Company |
| 2:2022cv00994 |
| June 6, 2022 |
| US District Court for the Eastern District of California |
| Dennis M Cota |
| Morrison C England |
| Personal Property: Other |
| 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury |
| Plaintiff |
Docket Report
RSS Track this Docket
This docket was last retrieved on February 22, 2023. A more recent docket listing may be available from PACER.
| Document Text |
|---|
| Filing 27 NOTICE of SUPPLEMENTAL AUTHORITY in Support of Plaintiffs' #15 Motion to Remand by All Plaintiffs. (Talley, Stuart) Modified on 11/22/2022 (Licea Chavez, V). |
| Filing 26 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Wendy Carol York on behalf of Nancy Hearden. Attorney York, Wendy Carol added. (York, Wendy) |
| Filing 25 NOTICE of CHANGE of FIRM NAME and Email Address of Counsel by All Plaintiffs. (Talley, Stuart) |
| Filing 24 OBJECTION by Brius Management Co., Brius, LLC, Shlomo Rechnitz to #23 Reply. (Lawrence, Jeremy) Modified on 8/3/2022 (Benson, A.). |
| Filing 23 REPLY by Charles Balding, et al., in support of #15 Motion to Remand. (Reiner, Russell) Modified on 8/1/2022 (Benson, A.). |
| Filing 22 REQUEST for JUDICIAL NOTICE by Brius Management Co., Brius, LLC, Shlomo Rechnitz in re #20 Opposition to Motion, #21 Request for Judicial Notice. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1, #2 Exhibit 2, #3 Exhibit 3, #4 Exhibit 4, #5 Exhibit 5, #6 Exhibit 6, #7 Exhibit 7, #8 Exhibit 8, #9 Exhibit 9, #10 Exhibit 10, #11 Exhibit 11, #12 Exhibit 12, #13 Exhibit 13, #14 Exhibit 14, #15 Exhibit 15, #16 Exhibit 16, #17 Exhibit 17, #18 Exhibit 18, #19 Exhibit 19, #20 Exhibit 20, #21 Exhibit 21, #22 Exhibit 22, #23 Exhibit 23, #24 Exhibit 24, #25 Exhibit 25, #26 Exhibit 26, #27 Exhibit 27, #28 Exhibit 28, #29 Exhibit 29, #30 Exhibit 30, #31 Exhibit 31, #32 Exhibit 32, #33 Exhibit 33, #34 Exhibit 34, #35 Exhibit 35, #36 Exhibit 36, #37 Exhibit 37, #38 Exhibit 38, #39 Exhibit 39, #40 Exhibit 40)(Lawrence, Jeremy) |
| Filing 21 REQUEST for JUDICIAL NOTICE by Brius Management Co., Brius, LLC, Shlomo Rechnitz in re #20 Opposition to Motion. (Attachments: #1 Exhibit 1-10, #2 Exhibit 11-20, #3 Exhibit 21-30, #4 Exhibit 31-40)(Lawrence, Jeremy) |
| Filing 20 OPPOSITION by Brius Management Co., Brius, LLC, Shlomo Rechnitz to #15 Motion to Remand. Attorney Lawrence, Jeremy A. added. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Jeremy A. Lawrence Lawrence, Jeremy) Modified on 7/29/2022 (Rodriguez, E). |
Filing 19
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 07/14/22 GRANTING Plaintiffs' pending motion to remand are hereby each extended one week to 07/21/22 to file Opposition and 08/01/22 to file Reply. The hearing date on the motion to remand remains vacated.(Licea Chavez, V)
|
| Filing 18 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Brius Management Co., Brius, LLC, Shlomo Rechnitz re #17 Stipulation and Proposed Order. (Lee, Joseph) |
| Filing 17 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Regarding Motion to Remand Briefing Schedule by Brius Management Co., Brius, LLC, Shlomo Rechnitz. Attorney Lee, Joseph added. (Lee, Joseph) |
| Filing 16 MINUTE ORDER (Text Only) issued by courtroom deputy for Senior District Judge, Morrison C. England, Jr.: On the Court's own motion and pursuant to Local Rule 230(g), the 8/4/2022 hearing on the Motion to Remand #15 is VACATED and SUBMITTED without appearance and argument. The opposition or statement of non-opposition and reply due dates shall be filed in accordance with the original motion hearing date. If the Court determines that oral argument is needed it will be scheduled at a later date. Any outstanding request for telephonic appearance is denied as moot. (Deutsch, S) |
| Filing 15 MOTION to REMAND to State Court by Plaintiffs. Motion Hearing SET for 8/4/2022 at 02:00 PM in Courtroom 7 (MCE) before Senior Judge Morrison C. England Jr. (Attachments: #1 Declaration of Richard Frankel)(Reiner, Russell) Modified on 7/1/2022 (Mena-Sanchez, L). |
| Filing 14 SUMMONS ISSUED as to *Shlomo Rechnitz* with answer to complaint due within *21* days. Attorney *Stuart C. Talley* *Kershaw, Cook & Talley PC* *401 Watt Ave.* *Sacramento, CA 95864*. (Kastilahn, A) |
|
Filing 13
ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/24/2022 GRANTING #11 Application for Pro Hac Vice. Added attorney Richard Frankel, PHV for plaintiffs. The Pro Hac Vice attorney is directed to request electronic filing access through PACER. (Coll, A)
|
|
Filing 12
STIPULATION and ORDER signed by Senior Judge Morrison C. England, Jr on 6/24/2022 ORDERING that, in the event that the Court denies the motion to remand, Defendants' responsive pleading shall be due 21 days after the order is issued. (Coll, A)
|
| PAYMENT for #11 Pro Hac Vice Application in the amount of $ 225, receipt number ACAEDC-10294671. (Reiner, Russell) |
| Filing 11 PRO HAC VICE APPLICATION and PROPOSED ORDER submitted by Nancy Hearden for attorney Richard Frankel to appear Pro Hac Vice. (Reiner, Russell) |
| Filing 10 STIPULATION and PROPOSED ORDER for Staying Defendants' Deadline to Respond to First Amended Complaint pending Resolution of Plaintiffs' forthcoming Motion to Remand by Brius Management Co., Brius, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Lawrence, Jeremy) |
| Filing 9 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Shlomo Rechnitz served on 6/16/2022 (Talley, Stuart) Modified on 6/17/2022 (Rodriguez, E). |
| Filing 8 SUMMONS RETURNED EXECUTED: Lee Samson served on 6/11/2022, answer due 7/5/2022. (Talley, Stuart) |
| Filing 7 STIPULATION re Extending Deadline to Respond to Complaint by Brius Management Co., Brius, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Proof of Service)(Lawrence, Jeremy) Modified on 6/14/2022 (Rodriguez, E). |
| Filing 6 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Brius Management Co., Brius, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order, #2 Magistrate Judge Consent in Civil Cases, #3 Notice of Availability, Voluntary Dispute Resolution, #4 Appearance of Counsel)(Lee, Joseph) |
| Filing 5 NOTICE of APPEARANCE by Joseph Lee on behalf of Brius Management Co., Brius, LLC. Attorney Lee, Joseph added. (Lee, Joseph) |
| Filing 4 CERTIFICATE / PROOF of SERVICE by Brius Management Co., Brius, LLC. (Attachments: #1 Notice of Removal)(Lawrence, Jeremy) Modified on 6/9/2022 (Coll, A). |
| Filing 3 CIVIL NEW CASE DOCUMENTS ISSUED; (Attachments: #1 Consent Form, #2 VDRP) (Mena-Sanchez, L) |
| Filing 2 CORPORATE DISCLOSURE STATEMENT by Defendants Brius Management Co., Brius, LLC. (Lawrence, Jeremy) |
| Filing 1 NOTICE of REMOVAL from Shasta County Superior Court, case number 198083 by All Plaintiffs. Filing fee $ 402, receipt number ACAEDC-10267435) (Attachments: #1 Exhibit A, #2 Exhibit B, #3 Exhibit C #4 Exhibit D, #5 Exhibit E, #6 Exhibit F, #7 Exhibit G, #8 Exhibit H, #9 Exhibit I, #10 Exhibit J, #11 Exhibit K, #12 Exhibit L, #13 Civil Cover Sheet) (Lawrence, Jeremy) |
Access additional case information on PACER
Use the links below to access additional information about this case on the US Court's PACER system. A subscription to PACER is required.
Access this case on the California Eastern District Court's Electronic Court Filings (ECF) System
- Search for Party Aliases
- Associated Cases
- Attorneys
- Case File Location
- Case Summary
- Docket Report
- History/Documents
- Parties
- Related Transactions
- Check Status
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
