Cases 1 - 8 of 8
Nancy Hearden, et al v. Shlomo Rechnitz, et al
as 23-15452
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NANCY HEARDEN, JOHANNA TRENERRY, IRENE KELLEY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
SHLOMO RECHNITZ, BRIUS MANAGEMENT CO., BRIUS, LLC and others
Nancy Hearden, et al v. Shlomo Rechnitz, et al
as 23-15195
Plaintiff / Appellee:
NANCY HEARDEN, JOHANNA TRENERRY, IRENE KELLEY and others
Defendant / Appellant:
WINDSOR REDDING CARE CENTER, LLC, SHLOMO RECHNITZ, BRIUS MANAGEMENT CO. and others
Angelina Martinez v. Novato Healthcare Center, LLC, et al
as 22-16312
Plaintiff / Appellee:
ANGELINA MARTINEZ
Defendant / Appellant:
NOVATO HEALTHCARE CENTER, LLC, BRIUS MANAGEMENT CO, LLC and BRIUS, LLC
Hearden et al v. Windsor Redding Care Center LLC et al
as 2:2022cv00994
Plaintiff:
Nancy Hearden, Johanna Trenerry, Irene Kelley and others
Defendant:
Windsor Redding Care Center LLC, Shlomo Rechnitz, Brius Management Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Hearden et al v. Windsor Redding Care Center LLC et al
as 2:2022at00588
Plaintiff:
Nancy Hearden, Johanna Trenerry, Irene Kelley and others
Defendant:
Windsor Redding Care Center LLC, Shlomo Rechnitz, Brius Management Co. and others
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441 Petition for Removal- Personal Injury
Martinez v. Novato Healthcare Center, LLC et al
as 4:2021cv09547
Plaintiff:
Angelina Martinez
Defendant:
Novato Healthcare Center, LLC, Brius Management Co, LLC and Brius, LLC
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1442
Carmela Rogers et al v. Lawndale Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LLC et al
as 2:2021cv03922
Defendant:
Brius, LLC, Ensemble Healthcare, LLC, Granite Hills Healthcare & Wellness Centre, LLC and others
Plaintiff:
Carnel Rogers and Carmela Rogers
Cause Of Action: 28 U.S.C. § 1441
ProAssurance Casualty Company v. Shlomo Rechnitz et al
as 2:2016cv08603
Defendant:
Brius Management Company, Inc., Brius, LLC, Carl Populus and others
Plaintiff:
ProAssurance Casualty Company
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
